Page 16 of 18 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 171

Thread: GPS in fell races

  1. #151
    Master DrPatrickBarry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Marple, Manchester
    Posts
    2,934
    How many people have said this, what is the point of a ban, when it is UNENFORCEABLE.

  2. #152
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Leeds. Capital of Gods Own.
    Posts
    11,176
    Like Ba Ba said leave it to the RO.

    When we study the facts only a very few have any concerns. Top 5/6 in a local race and top dozen in a championship event.

    I ran 12 years with a Garmin but never once had pre loaded data. It was only used for collection of data for me.
    Should people be penalized who are towards the steadier end of a race?

  3. #153
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Over Haddon
    Posts
    2,955
    Quote Originally Posted by DrPatrickBarry View Post
    How many people have said this, what is the point of a ban, when it is UNENFORCEABLE.
    Lots of rules and regulations are unenforceable but at least the breakers of those rules might be glancing over their shoulders as well as at their wrists and they might even look a bit sheepish at the finish line. But then again they might not give a shit!

  4. #154
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ambleside
    Posts
    5,471
    Leaving it to the ROs will split the sport in two, and create mistrust. Will those who have used their watch legally to navigate in some races comply and not use it in the same way in others? And when somebody does really well in clag in a race where navigational GPS use is banned will they be trusted? The FRA needs to decide - accept or ban GPS navigational use. If after some time it is felt the decision was wrong then it can be changed.

  5. #155
    Senior Member Sam W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    368
    Quote Originally Posted by DrPatrickBarry View Post
    How many people have said this, what is the point of a ban, when it is UNENFORCEABLE.
    There is a ban on running using another competitor’s number in all disciplines. Without asking people for ID when they collect their number, this is unenforceable (the only race I’ve been required to produce ID for is London Marathon). I’m not suggesting that fell race organisers should ask all runners to show ID when collecting numbers as this would be wholly impractical given the reliance on a small number of volunteers in ratio to runners. However, the ban on swapping numbers is upheld in spirit - there have been instances of DQ & penalties against clubs in road & XC races I’ve known of.

    Similarly, a ban on GPS for nav can still be upheld, even if it appears unenforceable (without someone speaking up against those they see using it). Appealing to the good nature of runners is part of our sport - just as much as asking them not to climb that wall/cross that field etc. is.

    I’m with Nic - leave it to the RO. Plenty of us don’t have a watch with nav functions, so I cannot see it splitting the sport.

  6. #156
    Senior Member Sam W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    368
    I’d also add that, by way of having a ban on GPS nav (at discretion of RO), those new to the sport are given an insight into the spirit of it. (After all, some may turn up on the start line with, quite innocently, a pre-loaded track on their watch. By having a ban at ROs discretion, aspirants are at least encouraged to have a good look at a map, or even recce.)

  7. #157
    Quote Originally Posted by DrPatrickBarry View Post
    How many people have said this, what is the point of a ban, when it is UNENFORCEABLE.
    I don't think it matters if it's enforceable or not, it's the principle that counts.

  8. #158
    Senior Member RaceTheSweeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Flagg Derbyshire
    Posts
    950
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark G View Post
    I don't think it matters if it's enforceable or not, it's the principle that counts.
    Totally agree :-)

  9. #159
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Close to the brewery
    Posts
    102
    Question.…… / story GPS not allowed at the following race

    Like many a fell runner Johnny likes to tuck in behind the person in front. Mist is down, and he and whoever it is in front have a blinder, hitting all of the lines perfectly. Johnny was really grateful that the person in front was such a good navigator / knew every inch of the course so well. Person in front used a GPS, Johnny has no idea that he did.
    Person in front has broken the rules, and not fessed up, so we don't like him.

    What about Johnny?

  10. #160
    Master DrPatrickBarry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Marple, Manchester
    Posts
    2,934
    Quote Originally Posted by Jennings View Post
    What about Johnny?
    He is OK.

    Becasue in a fell race, deciciding to follow somebody is a perfectly legal tactic, because you run the risk of following somebody that does not know where they are going and ends up leading the people behind him in the wrong direction. That has happened numerous times.

    Where Johnny had a suspicion that the bloke in front had a GPS, is purely down to honesty then.

    It really is nonsense, what is one meant to do if you see somebody in front checking a watch? You know what you are doing and can easily get around the course yourself, but you end up following him becasue it is easier, should you be disqualfied? How do you "unsee" him checking it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •