Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: Bum bag.

  1. #31

    Re: Bum bag.

    Saw a Karrimor Raid 2 t'other day - looked the part - not too big but with 2 seperate compartments and 150g - £8.95 on t'internet.

    Any folk use one?

    MH

  2. #32
    Senior Member egor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wakefield
    Posts
    466

    Re: Bum bag.

    ive got a raid, its not too bad, fits well to body and drinks holders are handy, use it it longer races when need to carry a drink

  3. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    tunbridge wells
    Posts
    20

    Smile Re: Bum bag.

    I absolutely agree re the Rock & Run rucksacks - mine lasted a mere 25 years before I had to get rid of it - I think it was called a Ridgerunner and I used it for everything, running, climbing, cycling, walking, going to work, and it developed some alarmingly large rips in it after it wore it while doing some back-and-footing climbing up some foul chimnney in north wales so I just glued some pertex to it and it was fine after that. In the end the thread holding it together started to go, and a hole developed in the lid so I gave it to a friend who still uses it. But I think i paid almost £12.50 (or was it £12/10 shillings) and was disgusted when it showed signs of wear after such a short time. Mind you, i bought a bum bag on the same day and I still use that and it's in perfect nick.
    Oh yes - and I saw a chap on the Saunders last year using the same type of Rock & Run Ridgerunner. Obviously he was lucky and bought a good one........

  4. #34
    Master Wheeze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Monmouth
    Posts
    7,389

    Re: Bum bag.

    Can't beat the PB BB for simplicity, value and longevity. Spent years faffing around with various water arrangements. Basically, bottles on waist bags suck. So, I have a camelbak system to try this year. Other than that, for very long races with available water, the Martin Stone Staminade In A Bag trick is still worth remembering. Why carry heavy water when you can scoop it up on the go?
    Simon Blease
    Monmouth

  5. #35
    Senior Member Silly Big Fella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Mid-Wales
    Posts
    266

    Re: Bum bag.

    Was searching for some advice on the Camelbak bumbags with a bladder. I don't want to wear a rucksac, but would like to carry water on log runs.

    Any reviews??

    I did spot that someone was thinking of buying a LifeVenture ProRunner. Don't. They're pants. I've got one that holds two water bottles. They jiggle all over the place, even when I've cut off the blood supply to my legs because the strap is so tight. And don't even get me started on trying to get them out of their holsters when in a race........
    He's big and he's good.

  6. #36
    undercover moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    behind you
    Posts
    897

    Re: Bum bag.

    Since Christmas, the effect of all this arsing about with swimming and bikes is that I've lost 10lb. This is despite drinking wine for England.

    Unfortunately, this was the particular 10lb was apparently the lump of me that kept my bumbag in place while running.

    I used to have no problems pulling it tight into a nice cushiony bit, but now it doesn't grip and just bounces.

    I may get someone on a YTS to carry my kit for me.

  7. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Plymnouth
    Posts
    24

    Re: Bum bag.

    Hi newbie to this forum, but to chip in if i may, i have been lucky enought to using a pre production OMM bumbag for the last 8 months....its new this season and is about 5lts - it has small pockets on the side as well and is very stable, even without any compression straps..have a look
    http://www.theomm.com/packs_Waist_pouch.html

  8. #38
    Master (notsomuchofa)Fellrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Tenby bound.
    Posts
    1,313

    Re: Bum bag.

    Quote Originally Posted by gucci View Post
    Hi newbie to this forum, but to chip in if i may, i have been lucky enought to using a pre production OMM bumbag for the last 8 months....its new this season and is about 5lts - it has small pockets on the side as well and is very stable, even without any compression straps..have a look
    http://www.theomm.com/packs_Waist_pouch.html
    Welcome gucci,

    I like the idea of the small elasticated pockets at the side (ideal for getting to energy gels) & I realise that as a tester you may be a bit biased towards the OMM, but is 3ltrs large enough for waterproof kit?

    Cheers.
    I've just decided I don't trust you anymore.

  9. #39
    Senior Member Phil_N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    On the edge of the Fens
    Posts
    131

    Re: Bum bag.

    Fellrunner - I've got one as well. Only got it recently so haven't used it in anger yet but was very impressed with it. It was very stable and comfortable. I managed to get a waterproof top (OMM Kamleika Smock), OS map, phone, cap, keys, jelly babies etc in. As you say the pockets are ideally for gels and compass. It's a bit of a tight squeeze but you may just about get a set of waterproof trousers in if required depending how bulky your top is.

    Hope that helps.

  10. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Plymnouth
    Posts
    24

    Talking Re: Bum bag.

    Fellrunner ....i have been using it on all manner of runs, and like Phil have had a Kamlieka jacket in it with ease...also squeezed in some other bits and bobs as well. It would easily swallow a pertex top and a small waterbottle, with the little pockets too for gels/keys etc. Although i am using predominantly OMM stuff at the moment, i have used the Lowe Mesa Runner (about the same size with compression straps), i have a Camelbak Flashflo, which is excellent for watercarrying, but if the reservior is full, then you can just get a pertex top in, and my experience with the TNF stuff is that they are too big. All in all, as biased as i am, i am happy with the OMM one, but i do like the simple look of the Pete Bland one...may have to give it a go!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •