Re: Roclite 295 alternative?
Maybe you can try the Roclite 319 which has more cushioning.
Re: Roclite 295 alternative?
Look at your running technique.
Human legs can naturally "cushion" a hell of a lot better than any shoe cushioning. Try increasing cadence and shorten your stride. Give it a go next time you do the route and see how it feels.
Re: Roclite 295 alternative?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Terry the Tortoise
Look at your running technique.
Human legs can naturally "cushion" a hell of a lot better than any shoe cushioning. Try increasing cadence and shorten your stride. Give it a go next time you do the route and see how it feels.
100% agree and, if you think about it, how much difference can a half or quarter inch of rubber make when you're generating forces of up to six times your body weight? An analogy would be expecting an egg to remain intact if you whacked it with a hammer just because you wrapped it in a tea towel to "cushion" it.
Re: Roclite 295 alternative?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Terry the Tortoise
Look at your running technique.
Human legs can naturally "cushion" a hell of a lot better than any shoe cushioning. Try increasing cadence and shorten your stride. Give it a go next time you do the route and see how it feels.
I would take that advice. It has a lot of credibility. What Terry doesn't mention is that he came 4th in the Lakeland 100 wearing inov8 baregrip 200. These have no midsole/foam at all. Can't wait for these shoes to come out.
I've been up Watkin path many times in x-talons. It can be a bit jaggedy rock like but just run lighter and bend the knees.