No. He deleted it himself
Printable View
No. He deleted it himself
I thought I was ranting too much after a glass of wine and got a bit upset over my mother in lawÂ’s situation during lockdown. But the gist is IÂ’m not a happy bunny and no one is actually following any of the scientific evidence that is now out there.
Thoughts with you. It’s been a wretched time for so many people
It's ok to talk.Quote:
Originally Posted by brummievet
I found it moving in terms of your family situation and very honest about the covid.
Have a nice day Brummie with the family.
Interesting. Clearly, some of those testing +ve had it some time ago, and are no longer infectious. But they still had it at some stage. The idea that labs themselves are now contaminated with RNA fragments resulting in false positive tests is a worry. As to how many cycles of PCR amplification are needed to give a positive result, it does not correlate directly with viral load and infectivity - how much RNA is on a swab is not the same as how much RNA the person concerned is harbouring. Labs that have given +ve, then -ve, then +ve results on the same person are presumably not too contaminated. The concept that almost all of these are not reinfection is an important thing to know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Witton Park
Thanks for the link.
The Netherlands.
Attachment 8805
Oh dear, look what's heppened to the Netherlands since August
Attachment 8806
yes let's look at later info and this time one where you can see what the axes are :rolleyes:
Attachment 8807