Tell the Italian stallion to sort it out.
Printable View
Roxy Music. Make me a deal and make it straight
https://youtu.be/jDULlMa8Hxc
There you go. Right I’m off to bed. You tube is soo addictive.
I fear you’ll be disappointed ...
C’est la vie
Because I believe the gay cake case was a reflection of a lot that is wrong with this country and the thinking that drives cases like it. Your conclusions were wrong about that and I'm glad the supreme court saw sense even though for all the wrong reasons. Is there a connection between the kind of thinking on these issues and the thinking on Brexit? Absolutely!
Oh and another thing: you act in all self righteousness accusing me of nastiness towards Graham when I was just telling the truth and you're there openly cursing. As you say those in glass......
On the one hand we have John Boulton this week declaring openly and happily how the US and UK can make it happen. A let's get it done attitude, positive and uplifting. On the other hand we have the EU and its rot in hell mantra. The same can be said of Brexit adversaries. Nigel Farage's attitude that we can be an independent self governing nation that can make things better for it's people. And James O'Brian's attitude that we should stay in the EU because otherwise you'll get chlorinated chicken from America.
And he hasn't got the sense to realise the water supply here is full of the stuff.
No.
No. (And anyway neither Thailand, the good ol' USA nor Kazakhstan are in the EU).
And, for the absence of doubt, I actually like you and welcome your Forum contributions (...pause...) and, like knowing where I was when John Kennedy was shot, I remember exactly when and where I met you (to put you right about Pantani).
Here you go DT. The last paragraph of this “news” article should cheer you up.
https://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/new...-UpQvYGgNIQNTY
Annnd, Brexit is cancelled...
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...sing-telepathy
Maybe
And I was thinking to myself
'This could be heaven or this could be Hell'
Then she lit up a candle and she showed me the way
Now now. No squabbling. This Forum reminds me of an interview to join the FRA Committee.
Interview Panel/ Candidate
Q1. “Do you have a sense of humour to cope with squabbling members on the Forum?”
A1 “Yes”
Q2. “Do you have the patience of Job to overcome how dim members can choose to be when interpreting FRA kit rules?”
A2. “Yes”
Q3. “Do you know anything about fellrunning?”
A3. “Sorry. Absolutely nothing at all.”
Interviewing Panel
Never mind. Congratulations! The pass mark is 2 out of 3. When can you start?:)
Having now had a chance to look briefly into Oracle's sources, it strikes me that the alleged economic woes of some southern European nations and the indisputably high youth unemployment rates are not claimed by those economists to be an inherent failing of the Euro; more a failing of interventionist central banks.
Another straw man. There are several causes of economic migration, so the existence of one has no bearing on others. One provable source is the irreparable imbalance and divergence caused by the euro. It is pointless arguing. There is endless analysis of these problems, but I've yet to meet remainers who have studied any of it: most see the EU through rose tinted glasses. Or Should I tell my Greek and Italian tenants they were wrong to leave for economic reasons because fellrunners said so?
It is fascinating: I point out the massive levels of youth unemployment, now young adults with no future, and the desperate social problems it causes( including the rise of populism) yet the response is always total silence in the UK even amongst avowed socialists. As varoufakis says: We don't have real austerity here - look at Southern Europe for that. Remainers seem to prefer to pretend the suffering caused by the euro doesn't exist so long as it doesn't affect them personally. Hear no evil, see no evil.
Well, as economic difficulties in the Southern European states existed before both the Euro and the EU. I’d go with ‘banks’.
So in effect the structural issues were there before the Euro. The EU set out convergence criteria and fiddled it for some of the states entering.
Since then, they continue to ignore states, even Germany and France, who ignore the rules set out for Euro membership.
Either the rules were a red herring, economic BS, or the persistent bending of them is a problem.
I personally don't see how pre Euro central banks can be held responsible for a problem now. They haven't really been hands on for over 20 years.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...no-deal-brexit
Much head scratching here. So we couldn't manage a border with a FTA, but apparently we can manage one with No Deal.
Witton Park; It's rubbish, any "special arrangement" would be the backstop in everything but name and the DUP would never accept it.
In summary.
Mays' deal - No border.
Norway type deal - No border
No Brexit - No border.
Crash out - Border.
Deal without the backstop - Border.
So if the EU and Varadkar backdown then we end up with a border and all the social and security turmoil that will ential.
Meanwhile away from oversimplistic EU soundbites endlessly copied by remainers such as the quoted below......
EU are DELIBERATELY fomenting unrest in northern ireland by alienating unionists with a border within their own country down the irish channel. It is not just the IRA that used bombs. The only EU alternative which is insistence on a wall will alienate republicans, and no doubt wake up IRA. EU will force Varadkar to build it. so either way EU are fomenting trouble in northern ireland.
Northern ireland has few deepwater ports and airports so it is entirely possible to cope with technology as both david davies reported (a job he did before brexit vote)indeed EU reports have also considered. So allowing for the fact that no border is perfect, technology will do fine. So we will not build a border. The EU will, so blame them. Technology is the right solution. And will improve with time - but it does not suit the EU to admit it. How I hate ideologues.
The EU have deliberately weaponised the border to try to annexe northern ireland. Remainers are too illformed to se it. The deal is not a deal. it is promises of talks costing 39 billion with UK deliberstely hamstrung. Even the most starry eyed remainer must now see These are not our friends, so no deal is the only option. This is not "Mays" deal it is EU non deal, they refuse to negotiate on trade so why waste more time on them?.
I think that article has exposed the backstop for the total contrived nonsense it is. Can’t say I’m surprised. I’ve said it to you all along. It’s a way of trying to prevent the UK of exercising it’s full independence and making a success of Brexit. If not perhaps you can explain why Macron said that the UK would only be allowed out of the backstop if it allowed its waters to EU fishermen. Surely the backstop is only about avoiding a hard border in Ireland, no?
So to paraphrase, what you're saying is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EH1G4EwljM
One of the problems of the euro is that the members don’t have their own independent central bank. They aren’t able to adopt monetary policies that are right for their countries at any point in time. So for example after the financial crisis the UK slashed its interest rates and introduced QE much more quickly than the eurozone did. Eventually the eurozone did the same but initially the ECB bizarrely increased rates because of German concerns about inflation. What’s right for the German economy is totally different to the Greek or Italian economy. A one size fits all policy doesn’t work.
Government in turmoil, minority banging a drum, no leadership and relegation looming.
In football terms the song would be "Sack the board"