Do you really think that the FRA Committee believe that issuing a document is all that is required, and that they are not working on methods of giving practical workable support to RO based on that document?
Printable View
I'm sure they are and I'm sure that in many if not most cases it will be achievable but I strongly suspect there will still be occasions where it wont, in spite of the best efforts of all concerned. Its what happens then that worries me - not that I might not be monitored round a race but that the race might not exist because as it stands the RO would have to accept from the outset that his/her race didn't comply - and as runners we would probably all be totally happy competing in it regardless of that.
So you want a race to be run under FRA/UKA Rules and insurance even it can't comply with those rules just because the runners are happy to take part. Presumably in the event of a serious incident, you wouldn't be happy that the RO may be left to face the law of the land on his/her own, and without insurance that now proves to be invalid and personally liable for any claims. That's the context and reality we face.
I nearly fell off my chair laughing then Grumps.. you using Khamsins quote insulting people sniping from anonymity....
Brilliant..
Lets all just link to our power of 10 profiles? what else? I'm quite clearly who I am, ML, international runner. Contrary to belief it is in fact Ok, no further healthy, for people to hold different views.. even from the anonymous Grumps..
That was a classic by you there.. I'm off for a lunch with a smile on my face thanks!
I suspect the next piece of advice will be that all RO's should become limited companies to restrict their liabilities in the same way the FRA and several running clubs have done.
The link to the new rules on the homepage is broken.
Fell running is safe.. http://www.ratracemanvsmountain.com/ Supposedly the Grump is RO... Breezey's idea.. remove liability risk by making 1 mill per race..