Millipede's summed me up correctly, thank you Milli, if i've caused offence to anyone, i apologise, sometimes my sense of humour runs away with me:o
Printable View
Millipede's summed me up correctly, thank you Milli, if i've caused offence to anyone, i apologise, sometimes my sense of humour runs away with me:o
dont apologise to the pc squad. What a load of bollocks, a few tongue in cheek comments and the handbags come out.Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylegs
Apologies young man:pQuote:
Originally Posted by TurboTom
You make me smile at times :D.Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylegs
honestly il never apologise for what i say if i mean it.
And as always i am naturally correct
Only at times?Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboTom
Everyones entitled to their own opinion, let em have their say mate;)
Hope you don't marry someone who thinks their naturally correct too:eek:
Pity the ole legs can;t follow the lead of your SOH!....:mad: :p :DQuote:
Originally Posted by merrylegs
Joking
Yes let me warn you against that too.Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylegs
I married one of those, and she really wouldn't mind me saying so on this forum as she reminds me most weeks that she's always right.:D
I admit it was tough at first but I know my place now, I've succumbed to suffering soap operas, and been forced into late night forum perusal for enjoyment (as well as a bit of running).:D
Be warned.
Truth be told, you come to love it.....being put in your place. It is a thrill allof its own. Just don't be caught rolling your eyes save you may be spanked.Quote:
Originally Posted by fellgazelle
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:;)Quote:
Originally Posted by FellMonster
Enjoyable in both a metaphorical and literal senseQuote:
Originally Posted by fellgazelle
Whipped, a friend calls it.
EDIT: I'm being summoned. Goodnight all
I was fully expecting a joke to come from that as i typed and you did not dissapoint me sir, bravo;):DQuote:
Originally Posted by FellMonster
Not sure what you mean by that care to explain?Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboTom
Shame you use the word alienate but as I said earlier, this potentially is the anomaly - in order for people to openly express their views to all, other people will not be able to access them till they reach a certain age. Or there is a code of conduct put in place so views are expressed appropriately for all. (Which means not using the B word Tom )
The other thing of course is that as there is nothing on offer of interest to young people on the website or forums whether that should be rectified, would not a proper youth section site developed by young people working alongside Brett (if you can stand his smell) be a positive addition for youth membership, cos the other way to look at it is how many young people do not come on here and should we not be attracting our youth membership. Or will the FRA always be third best to BoFRA and the local fete when it comes to children and young people?
The relationship of the forum to the wider FRA is similar to the relationship between fell running and running in general....very few do it by proportion and most of the larger group probably think the smaller group is somewhat mad!.
Out stats show that there are less than 100 regular users...a very small proportion of the FRA membership so ouir views are hardly representative of the whole. That was amply showed by the outcome of the UKA referendum.
I reckon we do a pretty good job of policing ourselves, especially since many posters regularly take the moral high ground. We're hardly swimming in a sewer here are we?
What I'd like to know is why has Chris Smale(Cartman) been banned for taking the moral high ground?
If it's for using bad language and insulting people then why haven't others been banned too?
Including you. Evidence in my quote belowQuote:
Originally Posted by christopher leigh
But if there was a better job in policing and a more welcoming environment and less of the "we don't want interlopers" attitude that Henry Porter encountered.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wheeze
Would the forum have a greater membership and be more reflective of grass roots views, rather than those of obsessive eccentrics. The current membership of the forum is is probably the best argument for a code of conduct and shiner a greater light on its darker recesses.
There is a code of conduct that every person who signs up to this forum agrees to abide by. What I want to know is why has Chris Smale been banned when there are others on here using the foulest of language?Quote:
Originally Posted by Antisocial
Perhaps a PM to a moderator is your best approachQuote:
Originally Posted by christopher leigh
Quote:
Originally Posted by FellMonster
Ok is that Brett?
__________________________________________________ _______________
Heathen: A person that lacks culture and moral principles.
Gold is king, diversification is dead.
Among others......there's also David, and Mud.....and probably more I don't know aboutQuote:
Originally Posted by christopher leigh
PS_ did you enjoy your cycle with Lance y'day?
I've a few things to say about that, but I'll save it for the Tour-de-France thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by FellMonster
Coolio.... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by christopher leigh
Check out http://www.felljunior.org.uk which has been running for about 9/10 years with the objective of supporting junior fell running. It originally hosted BOFRA and Kendal Series info as well until they got their own sites up and running. There was also a junior race calendar, which has now been replaced by the extract on the FRA site. Instead, there are now links to these new resources.Quote:
Originally Posted by Antisocial
It attempts to complement this site, mainly by providing the junior championship points tables. However, it does not host a forum for the very reasons being discussed in this thread. I don't have either the computing resources or time/inclination/patience to moderate.
Ultimately though the means don't matter, it is more important to ensure junior fell running continues to prosper.
Had a look, it would be nice if the FRA could this itself though instead of relying on outside good will, perhaps Al, Stolly and Merrylegs could be moderators on a junior forum :rolleyes: or perhaps not.Quote:
Originally Posted by FellJunior
On a serious not Tom and Scott would be the logical choice if it was something they were interested in.
Found itQuote:
Originally Posted by christopher leigh
"By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-oriented, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws."
So do we all resign from the forum for breaking the above rules or do we get new moderators for encouraging breakage of the rules by not enforcing them?
Chris Leigh is certainly out for his hateful posts on Lance Armstrong!
:rolleyes: See off-topic for your answer to that :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by christopher leigh
Simply put: "NO!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Antisocial
Live under a stone do you fell monster?Quote:
Originally Posted by FellMonster
Aye, right next door to you HenryQuote:
Originally Posted by Antisocial
Henry - I wish it takes me all my time to manage one persona never mind several. If I did the multiple user bit I quite fancy Britney or perhaps Juan as alternative names.Quote:
Originally Posted by FellMonster
Were you one of those who bullied poor HP off the forum?
Many things I am sir, but a bully I am not. And I woundn't quite say "poor HP" was bullied in the first instance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Antisocial
True or false:
1) You are / were HP??
2) You know who HP is / was?
3) You encouraged HP to make the original post?
Didn't consider you to be a man of exoctic tastes.....how wrong I seemingly am.
False - only ever used antisocial, previously with a picture of the real me, which I am happy to reinstateQuote:
Originally Posted by FellMonster
False - Brett won't tell me
Nope - came out the blue
I have no idea whether he is a multiple user but I get the impression who was someone who who was making a genuinely felt comment and was surprised at the response.
You seem surprised also that you are wrong - don't worry no one else is:D
1) I've seen the said picture of yourself which was your previous avatar.....no need to punish me again! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Antisocial
2) I am shocked not surprised sir
3) Aren't these little games fun?
I suspect you quite like "punishment"Quote:
Originally Posted by FellMonster
You must be in a constant state of it then
Depends whether they drive innocent posters away by using a little Englander mentality.
AS please shut up. Its no longer a case of your broken record ruining the odd thread, you're fast ruining the whole forum for me :(.
So you are advocating censure now, perhaps you could become a moderator and ban me for breaking the code of conduct, after all you are the expert at this - so perhaps you should leave after all you have just stated you don't like what you are reading?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stolly
Lighten up Stolly - we both repeat ourselves all the time, you doing it by saying "and then I ran up this hill and here's a picture! "
Its okay I could do with a rest from here anyway :D. I have now either increased or reduced the tosspot ratio of active posters on the forum by one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Antisocial
I hope you are not trying to bully Stolly much as poor HP was bullied.Quote:
Originally Posted by Antisocial
Not at the moment, but if I wanted to could you show me how please:DQuote:
Originally Posted by FellMonster
So you're thinking about it then? Well since you and Hp are bessie mates (as they say in OZ) perhaps he can advise you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Antisocial