Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 116

Thread: Waterproof as minimum standard

  1. #21
    Master Hes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    3,970

    Re: Waterproof as minimum stan

    I agree with you, and I have been thinking of getting a new pair as I seem to run in some pretty extreme weather but I'd like to be sure I'm getting what I ask/pay for if I've been misled in the past! It's a blooming minefield
    Quote Originally Posted by karen nash View Post
    I too have mistletoe trousers and they have passed kit check in past and were sold as waterproof. However they are not very waterproof in reality and I would always pack my better ones if the forecast was bad, so woul reluctantly understand if they failed a kit check in the future. Would like to know where the exact requirements will be posted, or is it RO discretion? Bit expensive to keep buying updates or not being sure
    'The birds are the keepers of our secrets'

  2. #22
    Master Hes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    3,970

    Re: Waterproof as minimum stan

    You've got a point! Mind you, I like to actually run in extreme weather (as well as sit about injured) so it looks like I'll need to fork out on a decent pair! To be fair, the fact that mistlites turn out not to be waterproof will explain why I thought I must be condensating/sweating cobs in them! Nevermind, they've saved my bacon numerous times so I've got my £20 quids worth and I won't begrudge spending a bit more on a new pair of waterproof leggings.
    Quote Originally Posted by RichK View Post
    Those Inov8 mistlites were a bit of a disgrace IMO. I bought the top and trousers as a novice and believed them to be waterproof according to the marketing, but they turn out not to be.

    I've long since binned the jacket (crap zip) but still keep the trousers. I've always thought they would be sufficient if I had to stop running but I'm wondering now if they have to go.

    I'm with Rob's idea, I don't think its fair to dismiss it as ticking a box to pass the kit check. Cheap waterproof kit might be no good for running in, but the reason you're carrying it is to wear if something goes wrong and you have to stop and wait. Even cheap kit can do that.
    'The birds are the keepers of our secrets'

  3. #23
    Senior Member shadbolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    178

    Re: Waterproof as minimum stan

    Quote Originally Posted by helix View Post
    I can't help but think that the change is related to a certain company releasing an upgrade to their previous lightweight range which has taken it from water resistant to waterproof. I'm not normally a conspiracy theorist but this one smells a little of collusion.
    I do like a good conspiracy theory :thumbup:.

    All those who bought the Mistlite pants thinking they were waterproof are now queuing up for a pair of Racepant 150s at £80.

  4. #24
    Master Hes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    3,970

    Re: Waterproof as minimum stan

    I'm not buying them on principle!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by shadbolt View Post
    I do like a good conspiracy theory :thumbup:.

    All those who bought the Mistlite pants thinking they were waterproof are now queuing up for a pair of Racepant 150s at £80.
    'The birds are the keepers of our secrets'

  5. #25
    Master sbrt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Somewhere in the middle
    Posts
    1,629

    Re: Waterproof as minimum stan

    Quote Originally Posted by Hes View Post
    It's a blooming minefield
    V true
    The saunders and the Rab mms, require waterproof cags but windproof kecks are allowed. For the omm its full waterproof all round. A longs waterproofs, B+C medium and shorts may be windproof and races held on the first Monday of the month must be run naked.

    Just remember the rhyme

  6. #26
    Master Hes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    3,970

    Re: Waterproof as minimum stan

    Look what I found...can't blame us all for being confused!
    http://www.facewest.co.uk/Inov8-Mistlite-130-Pant.html
    'The birds are the keepers of our secrets'

  7. #27
    Master Hes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    3,970

    Re: Waterproof as minimum stan

    :thumbup: that's put me off my baked potato!!
    Quote Originally Posted by sbrt View Post
    V true
    The saunders and the Rab mms, require waterproof cags but windproof kecks are allowed. For the omm its full waterproof all round. A longs waterproofs, B+C medium and shorts may be windproof and races held on the first Monday of the month must be run naked.

    Just remember the rhyme
    'The birds are the keepers of our secrets'

  8. #28
    Master sbrt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Somewhere in the middle
    Posts
    1,629

    Re: Waterproof as minimum stan

    Quote Originally Posted by shadbolt View Post
    I do like a good conspiracy theory :thumbup:.

    .
    Ah yes! I noticed that a certain company, that has just brought out a new clothing range. Has no hooded windproofs but has two new cags, that meet new FRA regs:w00t:

  9. #29
    Master karen nash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Preston
    Posts
    1,291

    Re: Waterproof as minimum stan

    He's, I bought my mistletoes at about the same time and place. I know now from experience they are not that great as waterproofs although if I am still moving they are Ok and because they are short and elastic at ankle they are not so annoying to run in.
    My heavier pair are goretex and weigh a bit more and bulk a bit more but they do keep me dry.
    so I take what I think best for the conditions eg some OMMs I have def opted for the heavier pair and sometimes I have been glad I did.
    the are many occasions where I feel the mistletoes will be fine and what I want to avoid is a row with a RO about them

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Leeds. Capital of Gods Own.
    Posts
    11,176

    Re: Waterproof as minimum stan


Similar Threads

  1. FS: USA Fender Standard Strat
    By Woodenwealth in forum Sales and Wants
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30-08-2013, 11:32 AM
  2. Minimum alcohol pricing.
    By Mike T in forum General chat!
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 27-03-2012, 07:04 PM
  3. Minimum Wage Furore
    By Witton Park in forum General chat!
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 21-06-2011, 03:52 PM
  4. New Waterproof
    By Clash City Rocker in forum Equipment
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-01-2011, 10:21 PM
  5. BGR - What standard to do it?
    By kaskajohn in forum Bob Graham
    Replies: 141
    Last Post: 13-11-2008, 09:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •