Haha I thought that - radical move! I'm kind of proud to have the final post...Originally Posted by Witton Park
It was Sam Harrison. I'd have him barred from the forum. Apologising to Lefty! We can't have people apologising on here
But seriously, I thought some valid points were being raised on there. I hope I'm not the only one that was enjoying the debate. It's good to debate these things, no?
Maybe if I keep replying to this one I'll get the last post before this one's censored again...
There must be a sensible reason behind it. But that shouldn't stop us speculating.
I'm with Governor Sio Bibble on this one:
A communications disruption could mean only one thing: invasion!
Anyone for a poll?
Sensible? Like saying fell races must have no hazards you mean?
Quote Einstein: "common sense is the net sum of all prejudice learned before the age of 18"
locking a thread without good reason, and at least indicating what that reason might be, is a poor show. There's nothing particularly controversial in that thread and it seems to have been locked at a very odd point in the conversation.
Can we have some feedback from the moderators, please?
....it's all downhill from here.
The thread had run it's course and was boring as shit (just my personal opinion; I'm not, nor ever have been a moderator)
Poacher turned game-keeper
I think Derby Tup has run it's course and is boring as dirt. Can the moderators stop it posting please?
Just my opinion
whatever: no reason to lock it, though. Plenty of other boring threads on here, if you look....The thread had run it's course and was boring as shit
....it's all downhill from here.
You don't need to look that far either.....
I've learnt so much from my mistakes, I'm actually thinking about making a few more.
Reporters are allowed into inquests - they can if they wish take down and publish every word spoken, in which case we would all know what the UKA witness statement said. Should such knowledge really be left to the whims of the media?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote