2nd page. Brill.
I COMPLETELY agree with FNstein but this thread was obviously (Doh!) meant to lure you in over a comment you made yesterday:
You clearly see things in a simplistic right wing, left wing view. I have a much broader view of the world than that, DD.
I'm probably much more liberal than you and you're the one labelling people, not me....
Anyway, back to the question...... You'd have to say communism IMO
Last edited by TheHeathens; 14-03-2014 at 12:50 AM.
But would communism have had such an influence without German aggression in the 20th century? Discuss.
All the answers are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._by_death_toll
Those bloody right wing mongols seemed to have done well, wiping out perhaps as much as 7.5% of the world's population with their 'Thatcherite policies' , albeit over 150 years.
Get a life pal. I made a flippant smart arsed remark after you made a stupid misinformed one. Now you've wasted your time thinking about how to get me back and make yourself feel better.
You should get a hobby. I've heard fell running is quite good.
I'm not going to point out the way you've contradicted yourself in that response.
Talking about it on the internet is better, at least that's what I'm telling myself.You should get a hobby. I've heard fell running is quite good
Anyway Mongols FTW
pies
If the power of the state is paramount over the lives of the individual, then the numbers who died need to be balanced against the current state of those nations and the people who live there.
For example in China, some people might argue that Mao's influence was transformative.