Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Mudclaw Sizes - Classic vs Newer

  1. #1

    Mudclaw Sizes - Classic vs Newer

    Hi,

    Does anyone have experience of the size/fit comparison between the Mudclaw classic yellow ones and the newer designs?

    I could still stick with the classic of course, you can still get them.

    I thought they were going to live forever, but at 600 miles it's time for them to retire... studs have gone.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Peak district
    Posts
    15
    ... I recently bought a pair of the Mudclaw 275’s in my usual size (9.5 UK) and my impression is that the last is slimmer than the previous versions I’ve had. They remind me more of a Walsh PB (?) fit ... (or perhaps it’s the same last but they just feel slimmer being all black ‘n’ all ��)... anyway, a bit too slim for me so hoping to sell them on ...

  3. #3
    I can confirm that (at least for a size 7) the fit is pretty much the same.

  4. #4
    Well I took 8.5 for years but now find them a bit too tight. I got on better with a size 9 I bought from a friend. So either my feet have grown or the size has changed slightly.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Peak district
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by slow'n'steady View Post
    ... I recently bought a pair of the Mudclaw 275’s in my usual size (9.5 UK) and my impression is that the last is slimmer than the previous versions I’ve had. They remind me more of a Walsh PB (?) fit ... (or perhaps it’s the same last but they just feel slimmer being all black ‘n’ all ��)... anyway, a bit too slim for me so hoping to sell them on ...
    ...it seems that my toes didn’t lie
    https://www.sportsshoes.com/product/...hoes-%7E-aw20/
    ... it seems that the various flavours of mudclaws do have different volumes in the toe box ... who’d ‘a’ thunk it ....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •