Page 160 of 357 FirstFirst ... 60110150158159160161162170210260 ... LastLast
Results 1,591 to 1,600 of 3570

Thread: Coronavirus

  1. #1591
    Master Witton Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Blackburn
    Posts
    8,807
    Quote Originally Posted by Stagger View Post
    18 weeks of shopping at local tesco and now our PM say we should wear masks in shops???

    Strange to say that now.
    I won't be. Bonkers.
    Richard Taylor
    "William Tell could take an apple off your head. Taylor could take out a processed pea."
    Sid Waddell

  2. #1592
    Master molehill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Rhandirmwyn
    Posts
    4,113
    Not really, the scientific evidence has been somewhat vague and changing with interpretation. I think it makes a lot of people feel happier and safer to be doing what they see other people doing in other countries, so he's now simply going along with what (majority) of people want. It is no big deal if the shopkeepers feel safer if customers wear them, then so be it, but personally Im happy to simply not go close to others - keep my distance.
    Can't see what the fuss is about, we've got some in the car for if needed, but never worn one yet.
    Don't roll with a pig in poo. You get covered in poo and the pig likes it.

  3. #1593
    Master Dave_Mole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    the Moon
    Posts
    1,287
    "I won't be."

    Hope you can afford the £100 a pop, then 😊

  4. #1594
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    715
    I think there will be potentially £100 fine for non-compliance too so I imagine, whether you agree or not, people will wear masks in shops. There’s a sort of logic in that, with social distancing relaxing and businesses getting going again, wearing masks will be a small (and sensible) price to pay. I think there’s a lot of evidence to show that masks do reduce the spread of the virus to be fair

  5. #1595
    Master Dave_Mole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    the Moon
    Posts
    1,287
    "I think there’s a lot of evidence to show that masks do reduce the spread of the virus to be fair".

    It's that thing, isn't it: that even if the evidence isn't especially equivocal, that even if there's a possibility that they may help it's probably a good thing to wear them if you can't socially distance /are in an enclosed space.

    If they don't help, then so what? But if they do.......

  6. #1596
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Over Haddon
    Posts
    2,976
    I'll be doing a big shop on the 23rd.

    After that I'll be wearing a buff if I go in a shop and pretend that there is horizontal sleet blowing down the frozen food aisle.

    I just hope they don't make me wear one in the pub!
    Last edited by Llani Boy; 13-07-2020 at 11:39 PM.
    Visibility good except in Hill Fog

  7. #1597
    Master Witton Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Blackburn
    Posts
    8,807
    I'll be wearing a motorcycle helmet if I have to go in a shop.

    Just consider.
    Today I cannot go in to a shop with a motorcycle helmet on.
    Today I don't have to wear any face covering to enter a shop, and shop workers also the same.
    On the 24th July if the date is accurate that flips over.

    BONKERS!

    As far as the evidence of benefit, we've been told for months it's flimsy.

    But what about evidence it's harmful. Has anyone looked at that?

    What possible risk might there be in the public wearing PPE that they haven't been trained in the use of?

    The idea is that the mouth covering restricts the transfer of CV by catching it in the covering. So that means there is likely to be a build up in that face covering.
    It would be like a super-accelerated petri dish. With each breath getting a fresh blast of nice, warm, moist breath and COVID.
    Not only the COVID, but what about the other potential lurgies that could be caught and grow on that face covering for an hour, including maybe fungi or mildew.

    So you don't have it, you contact someone with it and it hits your face covering. Would you be better off with just the one or two inhalations that your system might deal with, or with a one hour incubated dose growing on a mask and being inhaled every few seconds for a prolonged period?

    Consider this.
    CV.jpg
    Richard Taylor
    "William Tell could take an apple off your head. Taylor could take out a processed pea."
    Sid Waddell

  8. #1598
    Master molehill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Rhandirmwyn
    Posts
    4,113
    Due to a lack of cases in this area our local surgery has anounced today that it will be opening it's waiting room again for appointments (we waited in the car park and were called in or seen in a mountain rescue tent in car park). But they have said they think it best if patients please wear masks when attending, ideally bring their own but if not they will provide.
    I don't see this as a sudden shift in policy or the GPs are indecissive, or even what is different today the 14th July from yesterday? But just in the balance and given whatever evidence they have to sift through and discussed with their staff - as it is not all about the clients, but also the staff - that in balance it is now probably a better idea to wear in enclosed spaces. As I said, no big deal for me, I don't like the face masks but I'll wear one and get over it.
    Don't roll with a pig in poo. You get covered in poo and the pig likes it.

  9. #1599
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    715
    Quote Originally Posted by Witton Park View Post
    I'll be wearing a motorcycle helmet if I have to go in a shop.

    Just consider.
    Today I cannot go in to a shop with a motorcycle helmet on.
    Today I don't have to wear any face covering to enter a shop, and shop workers also the same.
    On the 24th July if the date is accurate that flips over.

    BONKERS!

    As far as the evidence of benefit, we've been told for months it's flimsy.

    But what about evidence it's harmful. Has anyone looked at that?

    What possible risk might there be in the public wearing PPE that they haven't been trained in the use of?

    The idea is that the mouth covering restricts the transfer of CV by catching it in the covering. So that means there is likely to be a build up in that face covering.
    It would be like a super-accelerated petri dish. With each breath getting a fresh blast of nice, warm, moist breath and COVID.
    Not only the COVID, but what about the other potential lurgies that could be caught and grow on that face covering for an hour, including maybe fungi or mildew.

    So you don't have it, you contact someone with it and it hits your face covering. Would you be better off with just the one or two inhalations that your system might deal with, or with a one hour incubated dose growing on a mask and being inhaled every few seconds for a prolonged period?

    Consider this.
    CV.jpg
    Snowflake 😉

  10. #1600
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ambleside
    Posts
    5,510
    Quote Originally Posted by Witton Park View Post
    I'll be wearing a motorcycle helmet if I have to go in a shop.

    Just consider.
    Today I cannot go in to a shop with a motorcycle helmet on.
    Today I don't have to wear any face covering to enter a shop, and shop workers also the same.
    On the 24th July if the date is accurate that flips over.

    BONKERS!

    As far as the evidence of benefit, we've been told for months it's flimsy.

    But what about evidence it's harmful. Has anyone looked at that?

    What possible risk might there be in the public wearing PPE that they haven't been trained in the use of?

    The idea is that the mouth covering restricts the transfer of CV by catching it in the covering. So that means there is likely to be a build up in that face covering.
    It would be like a super-accelerated petri dish. With each breath getting a fresh blast of nice, warm, moist breath and COVID.
    Not only the COVID, but what about the other potential lurgies that could be caught and grow on that face covering for an hour, including maybe fungi or mildew.

    So you don't have it, you contact someone with it and it hits your face covering. Would you be better off with just the one or two inhalations that your system might deal with, or with a one hour incubated dose growing on a mask and being inhaled every few seconds for a prolonged period?

    Consider this.
    CV.jpg
    Doses of Covid cannot grow on masks - they need to be inside cells to grow.

    Cloth masks interfere with exhaling CO2? - er - no.

    We are constantly inhaling fungi and mildew - our immune systems know how to deal with it.

    As has been said, if you dislike masks you will not be impressed with being ventilated.

    I wear a mask to protect you .....

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •