A cabinet of mostly talentless sycophants and yes men/women, just there to tick off brexit, have suddenly been found completely out of their depth
Surely that better than the other 2 parties that never had any depth.
Corbyn was a joke.
Not true. Scotland has been the worst.
https://www.scotsman.com/news/politi...ngland-2850266
Some of those failings are undoubtedly true, but are they all the fault of the Government?
Take Cheltenham and the Liverpool game. At the time Patrick Vallance was not in favour of banning those events. He said it would not have a big effect on transmission rates. So rightly or wrongly the Government was only following the advice of its chief scientific officer.
Testing and PPE provison in the early days were both inadequate but they were the responsibility of Public Health England. For a whole month PHE turned down requests from private and university labs to assist with the testing. It was only when the Government got involved and overruled PHE that this changed.
I said at the time that Cummings made an error of judgement, but ultimately the worst that the police could say about the whole episode was that he might have committed a minor breach of lockdown rules in going to Barnard Castle. Most of the criticism was clearly politically motivated. The most vehement critics of Cummings have turned out to be the people who have cheered on the mass BLM protests, if not actually taken part in them themselves. This has been a much larger breech of lockdown rules.
I have to say though, the failure of an NHS App was entirely predictable. Why they didn't go for Apple/Google in the first place is beyond me.
Richard Taylor
"William Tell could take an apple off your head. Taylor could take out a processed pea."
Sid Waddell
No, Boris was only responsible for the Plagues of Egypt; his sphere of influence is restricted to the Classical world.
But more seriously . . .
Yes, this is the problem: he has purged not only his cabinet, but his whole parliamentary party, of anyone who wouldn't do exactly what he demanded -- Sajid Javid being the most egregious example. In doing so, he got rid of a lot of talented and experienced MP's. The classic mistake of the megalomaniac, surrounding himself by yes-men (and yes-women), and then finding that there is no-one around him who can generate original ideas to solve problems.
The fact that many of these experienced politicians jumped before they were pushed doesn't make it any better. The constituency where I live is a classic example. Nicky Morgan was an excellent MP, who did a lot for the constituency (and I say that even though I never voted for her!). She resigned last year because the abuse she was getting from Brexiteers eventually became too much for her. She has now been replaced by an insipid woman who probably has a PhD in platitudes, but would probably never dream of criticising anything Boris did.
In his lifetime he suffered from unreality, as do so many Englishmen.
Jorge Luis Borges
There was something In the news I’m sure mentioning a period in April where the cases and deaths in Cheltenham were higher than nearby places like Bristol and Bath but it will be almost impossible to tell I’d have thought. The daft thing though is that people travelled from all over to go there and ‘herding’ c 250,000 people together in a pandemic, knowing that they’d be returning to all over the place, is a completely stupid thing to allow (unless you were still barking up the herd immunity tree of course)
Last edited by Fellbeast; 19-06-2020 at 07:27 PM.
The travel hubs and population density are clearly the problem.
Much of the rest of your opinions seem politically targeted rather than factual. For Vaccines, testing , politicisation of ppe study the facts not the press.
Boris took the views of medics who cannot agree to this day. Blame them. I do - they trashed the economy needlessly with project fear.
My other country is Portugal. All they did was more lax and later than the UK- reopening earlier , so attempting to blame Boris is a #fail
Anyone who mentions Cummings proves political intent not objective criticism.