I don’t know if you subscribe on-line but this article in the Telegraph explains some of the problems with the R number https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...d-way-measure/
It can be both! R does not tell you how many have got it/have had it - it simply tells you how many are infected by the average person with infection.
Most have not had it because most have not yet been exposed to it; when exposed, most get it. Of those, all are asymptomatic to start with, yet can spread it; some never develop significant symptoms, a % never develop any symptoms. Of course some unlucky ones end up in hospital, some very unlucky ones die.
Trolling in my opinion is disagreeing without explaining why.
You have suggested I don't understand how R works, but you haven't advised why.
Posts #1225 and/or #1229 set it out.
As for the Telegraph article, I think we covered this before you joined the forum in your current guise but you may well have read and or commented on it in one of your other guises.
Simpson's Paradox shows how R can distort the reality, especially marked when the cases are low and small pockets of infection make the R number jump - as pointed out by Dr Jenny Harries in her appearance at the Downing St press conference on Monday when she advised that the R number can mislead at this stage of the pandemic.
https://unherd.com/2020/05/what-the-...dont-tell-you/
This might help you.
Richard Taylor
"William Tell could take an apple off your head. Taylor could take out a processed pea."
Sid Waddell