Cw: 593/952 (62%)
Acw: 22/48 (46%)
Is really interesting. Thanks Bob!
Cw: 593/952 (62%)
Acw: 22/48 (46%)
Is really interesting. Thanks Bob!
Poacher turned game-keeper
Dunno*.
Genuinely don't know. I've tried to see if there's any correlation anywhere but there just doesn't seem to be any. DPFR started going clockwise about four years after the general change, in fact the top ten clubs all switched around then. Cumberland Fell Runners were almost all ACW until 1990 and almost all CW since then but the numbers aren't enough to cause a trend.
Interestingly the ladies stuck with ACW until around 2010, the men basically gave up on ACW in the mid 1990s, i.e. the overall "crash" was held off because of the ladies continuing with ACW.
*What do I do with the other 999? They are just clogging up my keyboard
Last edited by Bob; 08-07-2020 at 09:21 PM.
Bob
http://bobwightman.co.uk/run/bob_graham.php
Without me you'd be one place nearer the back
Fantastic info, and thank you for providing them .
CW is the preferred option clearly ( we are all traditionalist at heart!)
I wonder why the completion rate is less so on the AC route assuming most folk drop out at wasdale on the CW and Threlkeld on the AC route ? ( only my assumption ) is halls fell seen from many mile away more mentally challenging than Yewbarrow hence the better % on CW
Don’t underestimate the effect of descending Steel Fell to Dunmail and then climbing back up the other side on an acw round. Steel fell cw isn’t that bad after a morale-boosting trot down followed by a bacon butty. My guess is a lot of acw attempts flounder long before Threlkeld
Poacher turned game-keeper
When (and indeed if) I ever do a BG it has always been in my mind that it will be solo. Or at least very unofficial. I don't really have any desire to join the club, and I'd rather just pick a date and go out and do it. Although one or two people have offered to run legs with me.
I know it sounds a little disrespectful, like not being taken seriously, but if I do go for it, I'll have put in the miles, I know the vast majority of the route, although I've not necessarily been round all of it in the correct direction.
I've got a 35ish mile outing in a couple of weeks. If I hit schedule on that then a couple of weeks later have something longer planned. If that went to schedule then I'd feel completely confident to give the BG a go... However I have stuff planned for much later in the year and would have to seriously consider if a BG would jeopardise me physically for that...
Yes that is also a consideration, having been up over my head a few times in Shropshire last weekend. My route (for example on Leg 1) would certainly factor this in.
As I say its only a slim possibility and I've got other priorities and ambitions this year which take preference.
To go back to the original topic, I certainly wouldn't be walking the entire round!
It's always seemed to me that worst climbs come ACW:
Scafell from Wasdale is, for me, much worse than Yewbarrow.
As DT says, down SF and up Seat Sandal seems worse than vice versa.
Having done leg 3 ACW, I found the slog across Martcrag up to Pike o' Stickle a right bastard. And the Bowfell descent can be tricky nav-wise.
Halls Fell towards the end of the round - there's nothing like that after Yewbarrow on a CW round. And you've just had to descend Clough Head.
Bar the preferable start time and not having the big climb to Clough Head, I reckon CW is the 'easier' option (hohoho).
Geoff Clarke