er...
"I was a bit shocked when I heard about this around a week ago.
From what I have heard and read the first jab gives a person a partial immunity - say 70% and the 2nd tops it up to 90-95%.
A decision has been made to prioritise getting as many of the top level vulnerable to 70% as quick as possible and I believe other countries are planning similar.
It's on the basis that say having 1,000,000 at 70% is better than having 500,000 at 90% and 500,000 at 0%.
I don't think we have anyone on here qualified to critique it - although Oracle maybe could have advised what his wife thought of the policy had he still been on the forum. "
Care to lead by example?