Also, it depends whether said lad was doing a steady 10-miler once a week as part of his training for these short races.
I don't do long stuff and didn't used to do any steady runs in training. Consequently I was crap at long stuff and used to get beaten in long races by people who were about 40 seconds a mile behind me in short races. I'm using the past tense because I hope my current training will allow the odd long race - we'll see at Holme Moss.
Nah, that guy seemed ok, you would have stamped inov on the jelly baby and charged me for it and posted photo's of any that Jebby et al were eating and would have been given for free as "tests". Also if i had a geniune complaint such as it only had one leg then you would have kept very quiet and said it was down to the newsagent you got them from to do something about
I’m mulling over doing Ennerdale – the longest race I have done to date is Edale Skyline and was just wandering if anyone who has done both can tell me how much harder Ennerdale is?
Or comparing to Langdale which is the toughest lakes race I’ve done to date
Cheers
Just do it
Trying to plod up hills every day slightly faster than the day before
It's definitely a step up from Langdale & Edale. When I was running reasonably well I'd do Langdale in 2:30 - 2:40, Edale in 3:20 and Ennerdale in 4:20 - 4:30 to give you an idea of time differences. Yannis is right, though, carry some water cos there's not much on route.
One key thing with Ennerdale is that half way round you're a LONG WAY from the finish - there are no shortcuts back if you run out of steam.