Richard Dawkins does not exist.
I'm gonna get that cwazy gwouse...
Isn't it true that the point is we CAN'T define the universe - we don't know if it is finite or infinite and we don't know if there is one or many?
I'm gonna get that cwazy gwouse...
Oh how exciting.... this brings all sorts of happy memories back of Finals.
For me, for something to exist is has to be proven to exist. Also, not being able to disprove something does not prove it's existence. This is a classic weak argument of many believers, eg "science cannot disprove the existence of god so therefore god exists"... I could start my own religion worshipping an almighty celestial hamster and could put forward the very same argument for its existence with equal validity ie. not much.
A lot of Richard Dawkin's work is excellent but I don't think the God Delusion is his strongest. He comes across in it as being too zealous rather than relying on hard science and sound philosophical argument. I prefer Selfish Gene, Blind Watchmaker and, more recently, The Ancestors Tale.
Excellent read is Bertrand Russell's Why I'm not a Christian.
Let the fun begin!
If there is a god, I must have seriously pissed him off today!!