Page 66 of 145 FirstFirst ... 1656646566676876116 ... LastLast
Results 651 to 660 of 1441

Thread: New safety rules

  1. #651
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Settle
    Posts
    6,580
    Quote Originally Posted by LissaJous View Post
    Was that already in the rules back then? (One would presume so..)

    Some on here seem to think route markers are a bad idea because they are not a 100% guarantee of safety. I get really confused, the only 100% guarantee of safety (which I actually did on the day in question last year rather than racing in Wales) is to stay at home and hope you don't fall off a ladder.

    Does a marked route (and thank you to WP for expanding on that) guarantee 100% safety? No, of course not, and as you can see from the other UK mountain running death last year (during a race in Greece).

    Would it, on balance, have helped at Buttermere last year? Quite possibly a yes.

    Could marking of crucial sections be another bad-weather option for ROs? Fellrunners don't see it that way, apparently.

    Even if that meant the only alternative was cancellation? We don't cancel races 'cos we're not in Wales

    And I know that others believe flagged routes would encourage the wrong kind of people to race. I don't see why all races have to be alike (marked, unmarked), or why some parties take the prospect of any race being marked as such a threat.
    Love the colour coding . But like AI said if you're suffering/injured/hypothemic its at that point that you might purposely choose to leave the route of the race, whether flagged or not, just to get off the hill.

  2. #652
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by alwaysinjured View Post
    It was only an idea, not even one that appeals much to me. I like clag races.


    Which would you rather if given a choice? Bad weather cancellation , low level route, or the normal route but done as a group?

    I know AI and I've been wholly supportive of you on this thread. .. . just not on this point

    And which option would I choose... ?? option 4 - run the race as intended ala The Great Lakes last year

  3. #653
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Settle
    Posts
    6,580
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard123 View Post
    I know AI and I've been wholly supportive of you on this thread. .. . just not on this point

    And which option would I choose... ?? option 4 - run the race as intended ala The Great Lakes last year
    Yes. The Great Lakes race last year was an absolutely fantastic outing, one of the best ever in fact (says he as one of the herberts who went to far to the south coming over Stonesty Pike, effectively off my Pete Bland race map, and ended up doing a roundabout trudge to the finish via Wrynose and Blea Tarn).

  4. #654
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    197
    Haha. . a few did that I think, but isn't that what racing is all about? making your own choices, suffering the consequences

    I wish I had a transcript or tape of the race briefing though . .. bloody brilliant!

  5. #655
    alwaysinjured
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Stolly View Post
    Yes. The Great Lakes race last year was an absolutely fantastic outing, one of the best ever in fact (says he as one of the herberts who went to far to the south coming over Stonesty Pike, effectively off my Pete Bland race map, and ended up doing a roundabout trudge to the finish via Wrynose and Blea Tarn).
    OOpss.

    Every year some manage that on the langdale race too , by failing to hang a sharp left after the last crinkle.

    In fact you can tell how claggy it was on a langdale race day ,by how many come in from places like cockley beck and three shires.
    Last edited by alwaysinjured; 10-10-2013 at 03:16 PM.

  6. #656
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Monmouth
    Posts
    7,487
    Quote Originally Posted by LissaJous View Post
    Was that already in the rules back then? (One would presume so..)

    Some on here seem to think route markers are a bad idea because they are not a 100% guarantee of safety. I get really confused, the only 100% guarantee of safety (which I actually did on the day in question last year rather than racing in Wales) is to stay at home and hope you don't fall off a ladder.

    Does a marked route (and thank you to WP for expanding on that) guarantee 100% safety? .
    The event was a multi-leg relay and I can't recall under whose rules it was run. The route was marked....tape on poles about 100 metres apart. By the time the leg was run, viz was down to 10 metres..............

  7. #657
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Mid Wales
    Posts
    806
    Quote Originally Posted by alwaysinjured View Post
    You are making a but of an assumption: Not convinced it would have helped at Buttermere because reading from the coroners report, it was considered a probable deliberate off route descent to get down off high ground, just done in an unfortunate place. So routefinding marked or otherwise may have played no part in it.

    Not sure what you meant about the other runner...the trackers said he was hours off route at the point he fell, so routefinding may have had some hand in it.

    My point was that the race in Greece was not (as far as I can ascertain) supposed to be nav. It was a case of a marked/obvious route gone wrong.

    1991/1992; I only meant the map/compass rule (quite possibly not obligatory if it was a short, marked relay leg).

    If you're in trouble the last thing you'd want to do is head away from a marked route and any likelihood of being found/helped by other runners/reaching a CP/ or being rescued. Of course hypothermia may affect decision making/rationality. Even on an unmarked route, in the circumstances I would want to stay on the race route unless already lost/unsure of direction, or just possibly if desperate for shelter from the weather. That would only change if I was very sure of it being an escape option. Same if you're on your own in the mountains and something happens, you don't want to be away from recognized paths/routes, especially if you don't have a phone/signal. A marked course should simply reinforce this being the safe place to go.

    The flags in a Skyrace will often be eg every 10 metres anywhere there is a big chance of losing the way, or serious consequences.

    Please don't get the impression I am on a mission in favour of marked courses; I don't have a problem with them, but yes I love unmarked courses on distinctive mountain routes, preferably when the weather's good and I have had a chance to recce. But don't expect a race to be an International favourite on those terms.

    I'm much more concerned about people (not) carrying warm clothing in severe weather conditions.

  8. #658
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Coniston
    Posts
    299
    I don't want to see more route markers in races. I find it hard to see red flags and tape because I'm red/green colour blind. And 8% of men with Northern European ancestry are too. Running down the intake fields to the finish of the Turner Landscape Race I nearly tripped over a couple of flags before I saw them, and I managed to miss a number of flags on the Loughrigg race when I was supposed to pick them up on the way back from marshaling on the top.

  9. #659
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,734
    Quote Originally Posted by LissaJous View Post
    I don't understand the distrust of marked routes. If after a minute you can't see any flags, then at worst you're lost by a minute, and you know to backtrack until you find some markers again.
    You must run with higher calibre runners than me. One particular runner went off route following someone else, nobody including the runners in question actually knows where they went. But they ran without markers for 20 minutes before turning round, and they didn't double back either.

    The very same individual got lost briefly on his next race, and for the hat trick got so lost on the following race he arrived at the finish by car.

  10. #660
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by Don't fear the sweeper View Post
    I don't want to see more route markers in races. I find it hard to see red flags and tape because I'm red/green colour blind. And 8% of men with Northern European ancestry are too. Running down the intake fields to the finish of the Turner Landscape Race I nearly tripped over a couple of flags before I saw them, and I managed to miss a number of flags on the Loughrigg race when I was supposed to pick them up on the way back from marshaling on the top.
    I was going to bring up that point but thought it'd be too much of a minority point to count! I too am red/green colour blind and struggle following red tape even in the clear daylight.

Similar Threads

  1. Safety in solo runs?
    By AJF in forum General Fellrunning Issues
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 07-03-2013, 10:34 AM
  2. Four Safety Pins
    By #bob# in forum Sales and Wants
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-06-2008, 08:51 PM
  3. Rules rant
    By FellMonster in forum General Fellrunning Issues
    Replies: 129
    Last Post: 21-12-2007, 07:58 PM
  4. Board Rules
    By Woodstock in forum General chat!
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 22-06-2007, 03:59 PM
  5. Pub Rules!
    By The Landlord in forum General chat!
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-06-2007, 06:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •