New safety rules

[alwaysinjured]

Wynn's document has a number of rather sensible alterations / rewordings. I hope she has emailed it to Graham to include in the discussions.

AI, however has decided that he can't be bothered to do this, although he can be bothered to keep writing scaremongering posts on this thread. I think it IS time to "put up or shut up" as someone else said.

Lecky - had you been reading detail you would know, that
(a) the document wynn suggested was drafted by fellhound, and has been submitted by him, carrying my support for how for example , courses are treated.In the background I am speaking to others too.

(b) I have stated I submitted one similar issue for consideration, explaing why it is important to do. Whether it proves worthwhile to do more remains to be seen.

(c) People who are qualified to judge , confirm what I say is anything but scaremongering. Have you even considered the jeapoardy faced by wynn if someone dies on a route section judged non compliant because of poor wording , so UKA and / or insurers cut her loose? The cost of protracted defence could destroy her, let alone a successful claim.The emotional trauma is probably worse.