86th for me out of 402 starters (nevermind the DNFs ). That's sounds quite good and helps me gloss over my time
86th for me out of 402 starters (nevermind the DNFs ). That's sounds quite good and helps me gloss over my time
Lets not forget it's a really really hard race. I'd struggle to imagine that it's just 11 miles harder (so 20%) than Lakeland 50 ? But races like that are high profile and attract all sorts of newbies. It's certainly substantially tougher than any 50 mile Ultra I've ever raced. Surely that's the issue ? Also, I bet on any Ultra, there's a good chunk of DNF's ?
What's wrong, Stolly? Too shy to show how fast you were?
I was pleased with =162nd because it meant a comfortable sub-20 finish. I was expecting much slower with the speed we were going after grouping. To be unshackled at Yarnbury and be able to let fly (with the group's blessing of course) was a wonderful feeling.
Last edited by LM; 03-05-2013 at 08:03 PM.
Linda Murgatroyd, Calder Valley Fell Runners
I've got Fellsman blues today, wish I was out there doing it all over again!
Linda Murgatroyd, Calder Valley Fell Runners
I went up Ingleborough again this morning to check it was still there .
Me too - want to go back and do it better justice right now. I updated my route notes on Friday ready for next year. They have been honed yearly since 2003. Route changes apart, I have seen the preferred track change during that time as a 'Fellsman Trod' has evolved. There never used to be one. Is it getting like the 'BGR trod'?