Decline the jab

[Witton Park]

Now might be a good time to buy Pfizer shares then. Everyone's focused on covid, but Pfizer's pipeline is way broader: https://www.pfizer.com/science/drug-product-pipeline

PS. Don't take this as actual financial advice.

Of course it is and a drop in sales or write down of stock is not really the issue.

The problem is that the share price is spooked in the last couple of months due to a court case in Michigan where immunity from prosecution for vaccine injured was removed in some circumstances.

A handful of cases lost could render the shares junk value at the scale that the US legal system hands out damages.

Incidentally the judge also allowed the hospital involved to be sued.

[Graham Breeze]

Now might be a good time to buy Pfizer shares then. Everyone's focused on covid, but Pfizer's pipeline is way broader: https://www.pfizer.com/science/drug-product-pipeline

PS. Don't take this as actual financial advice.

Thanks but I wouldn't - knowing you have no inside expertise in big pharma.

But if you have a solid reliable tip for the best cryptocurrency?

[noel]

Thanks but I wouldn't - knowing you have no inside expertise in big pharma.

But if you have a solid reliable tip for the best cryptocurrency?

I've heard from a reliable source that you should take all your money out of the bank and buy gold.

[Graham Breeze]

I've heard from a reliable source that you should take all your money out of the bank and buy gold.

Great. Thanks. Now if I can only find a buyer for all my non fungible tokens.

[Witton Park]

I've heard from a reliable source that you should take all your money out of the bank and buy gold.

I've never quite got my head around what you are supposed to do with crypto, or even gold, should your currency collapse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWQfsx9Fj3A

[Witton Park]

This piece in the Spectator by Prof Carl Heneghan has received such a response that they have taken away the paywall so all can read.

No mention of vaccine, but I concur with what he has to say.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...-this-isnt-it/

[molehill]

As soon as the covid enquiry was mentioned I thought that this will go nowhere other than an opportunity for the legal profession to make money and the participants giving evidence to cover their backsides and point their fingers anywhere but at themselves.
At some point in the distant future the enquiry will end and results of the enquiry announced, and it will be “Lessons have been learnt”. An expensive nothing.
Good article, but not remotely surprising to me.

[Mossdog]

Thanks for posting the link WP. On the same subject and the Scottish Inquiry, there's an interesting article in the Daily Sceptic.

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/11/01/...excess-deaths/

Here's a section:

"The slightly awkward fact for Lord Brailsford and the SNP Government in Scotland is that as the current inquiry grinds ever on, deaths in 2023 are even higher than at the height of the Covid shenanigans.

The Scottish Inquiry is looking at the ‘pandemic’ period from January 1st 2020 to December 31st 2022. In setting up this time-limited period it was, we assume, presumed that deaths would have fallen back to their pre-pandemic level when the inquiry got under way, but not a bit of it."

Why is the Scottish Government spending millions of pounds to find out why more deaths weren’t averted during the pandemic period when they aren’t addressing the subject of excess deaths now when deaths are even higher?

"Perhaps if you’re interested in the answer to this question you could ask your MSP. I’m sure Lord Brailsford and his chums would be delighted to follow up the current inquiry with yet another looking at “what actions, if any, taken during the pandemic period on Jan 1st 2020 to Dec 31st 2022 had any consequence on excess deaths in 2023?”

[noel]

Why is the Scottish Government spending millions of pounds to find out why more deaths weren’t averted during the pandemic period when they aren’t addressing the subject of excess deaths now when deaths are even higher?

You're right. I think we need an enquiry to get to the bottom of that question.

[anthonykay]

This piece in the Spectator by Prof Carl Heneghan has received such a response that they have taken away the paywall so all can read.

No mention of vaccine, but I concur with what he has to say.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...-this-isnt-it/

Yes, an interesting article. In particular, I would agree that the Great Barrington Declaration made a lot of sense.

With regard to the ongoing Covid Enquiry: I think it is important that the total dysfunction and incompetence of the Johnson administration is exposed, but it is unfortunate that this is distracting from the real purpose of the enquiry, which should be to ensure that we are better prepared for future pandemics.