Quote Originally Posted by Danbert Nocurry View Post
General - This could have been an interesting topic if you'd have presented it in a reasonable manner. :w00t:

Personally I also tend to think that many sports are beyond the reach of the fabled "man in the street. To compete at olympic level and work for a living?? Not a chance. Having said that, it is not as exclusively for the rich as it was in Max Woosnam's day when it was virtually a closed shop. Tennis would not have it any other way of course, (no champ since before the war, speaks volumes) a top dressage horse can cost a million etc etc.

Darts seems to be as democratic as it gets, you can practise at home, kit costs very little, and therefore will never be an olympic sport:w00t:.

Danbert you hypocrite this has everything to do with the fact that private schools encourage sporting excellence, whereas under 'your' labour government normal children in the state sector were not allowed to win and losers got medals because everybody needed to be equal.

As you voted that shower of turds in, you're not allowed to comment on the Blairite sporting generation. Go and sit in a corner with your losers rosette and hang your head in shame.:thunbdown: