Was that already in the rules back then? (One would presume so..)
Some on here seem to think route markers are a bad idea because they are not a 100% guarantee of safety. I get really confused, the only 100% guarantee of safety (which I actually did on the day in question last year rather than racing in Wales) is to stay at home and hope you don't fall off a ladder.
Does a marked route (and thank you to WP for expanding on that) guarantee 100% safety? No, of course not, and as you can see from the other UK mountain running death last year (during a race in Greece).
Would it, on balance, have helped at Buttermere last year? Quite possibly a yes.
Could marking of crucial sections be another bad-weather option for ROs? Fellrunners don't see it that way, apparently.
Even if that meant the only alternative was cancellation? We don't cancel races 'cos we're not in Wales
And I know that others believe flagged routes would encourage the wrong kind of people to race. I don't see why all races have to be alike (marked, unmarked), or why some parties take the prospect of any race being marked as such a threat.
Love the colour coding . But like AI said if you're suffering/injured/hypothemic its at that point that you might purposely choose to leave the route of the race, whether flagged or not, just to get off the hill.