Safety Matters

[LissaJous]

LJ - you've confused me with your participation in this debate. I haven't really known which side of the debate you are on.
So your use of "completely" would perhaps be better replaced with "partially".

Aye, me too (you've confused me too, ever so slightly).
Again, I started to elaborate, then just deleted several paragraphs as its probably been said already on here before.

1. I'm not on either side.
2. We don't need a rift.
3. If you want to improve the way hundreds of ROs do the job then the FRA is the best way to go about it.
4. The important points have been heard by the people who need to know.
5. All that's left is a pointless personal vendetta.
6. The committee took a very circuitous journey to reach a position very similar to AI's.
7. Along the way they upset a few people and caused many more to lose confidence in them.
8. This does not mean the outcome is dangerous or completely misguided.
9. As they have said, a further, less hurried review is already underway.
10. If the outcome is still not good enough then a future committee will look at it again.
11. But if you side against the current committee you will lose.

We now realise that AI's reappearance was due to a strange interpretation of the £15 leggings discussion. I do not believe anyone was suggesting that these would protect you from hypothermia.