-
[QUOTE=Mike T;624889]...it is all so subjective, very few facts. QUOTE]
Looking at the bigger picture: I am reminded of the FRA 2006 AGM proposal from the floor (ie NOT supported by the Committee) that the FRA should secede from UK Athletics which, on a show of hands, was “overwhelmingly supported”.
This led to the 2007 postal ballot of the full membership when members were asked whether (or not) “ the FRA should stay affiliated with UKA for the present and review the future position in the light of experience”.
The ballot response was 86% to remain.
From "overwhelming support" to leave to 86% to remain. What changed?
Well, the AGM vote was based on little accurate information but a lot of emotional lobbying .
The postal ballot was taken after objective information had been made available and circulated to all members.
Now I would not suggest that the FRA Committee manages things better than the Government but if the Brexit view prevails on Thursday that would not be an unreasonable conclusion.
Last edited by Graham Breeze; 20-06-2016 at 04:10 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules