Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 76

Thread: Flm

  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    South East Lancashire
    Posts
    29

    Re: Flm

    Many congratulations Andi from all at Rochdale Harriers.
    Echo everything that's been said.

  2. #32
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Worth
    Posts
    17,254

    Re: Flm

    Quote Originally Posted by ajohns352000 View Post
    Just reading the BBC website - quote below

    "Among the fun-runners was Postman Paul Simons, 45, from Edgware, north London.
    He ran the fastest-ever marathon by a man dressed as Santa Claus in two hours, 55 minutes and 50 seconds, in aid of premature baby charity Bliss"

    I think its about time the term "fun runner" was removed from the bbc's lexicon. Anyone, regardless of what they are dressed in, who can run a marathon in under 3 hours is hardly a fun runner and its an insult to describe them that way

    And congratulations to Mr Jones on a great PB
    'Celebrity' runner Nell McAndrew got more air-time than Andi

  3. #33
    FellMonster
    Guest

    Re: Flm

    Quote Originally Posted by Derby Tup View Post
    'Celebrity' runner Nell McAndrew got more air-time than Andi
    To be fair, as a bloke, she's a bit easier on the eye

    but yes, it's not very nice to not show the first Brit finishing in a British run event for heavens sake.....will Andi get going to the World's now based on London? That's the real question

  4. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Leeds. Capital of Gods Own.
    Posts
    11,176

    Re: Flm

    Here is an interesting page.

    http://results-2009.london-marathon....3&event_id=MAS

    He slightly dropped off the pace around 30k although it was a tremendous effort.

    I think we will now go from stength to strength.

  5. #35
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Worth
    Posts
    17,254

    Re: Flm

    Quote Originally Posted by FellMonster View Post
    To be fair, as a bloke, she's a bit easier on the eye

    but yes, it's not very nice to not show the first Brit finishing in a British run event for heavens sake.....will Andi get going to the World's now based on London? That's the real question
    dom told me that Andi's target after a pb, was 2-15, which was what he needed to represent GB.

  6. #36
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    near the dark stuff
    Posts
    13,060

    Re: Flm

    I'll add my congratualtions as well.
    Well done Andi another storming performance.

  7. #37
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Up North
    Posts
    5,755

    Re: Flm

    Quote Originally Posted by Derby Tup View Post
    dom told me that Andi's target after a pb, was 2-15, which was what he needed to represent GB.
    I thought I heard the cut off standard was 2:16.............

  8. #38
    FellMonster
    Guest

    Re: Flm

    Quote Originally Posted by Ady In Accy View Post
    I thought I heard the cut off standard was 2:16.............
    B-standard is 2hr 17 with A standard being 2hr 12 I think.

    UKA can take 3 'A' standard athletes but only 1 'B' standard athlete, so fingers crossed.

  9. #39
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Back home for now...
    Posts
    11,681

    Re: Flm

    Quote Originally Posted by Derby Tup View Post
    dom told me that Andi's target after a pb, was 2-15, which was what he needed to represent GB.
    The UKA 'A' standard for the Worlds is 2-12, the 'B' standard is 2-16. Either way a PB by over 2 minutes is a fabulous improvement.

    As to why UKA insist on an 'A' standard 6 minutes faster than the official IAAF standard (2-18) is anyone's guess! Oh yeah... I've just remembered why... it's so they can waste more money funding sprint relay squads to drop the baton...

  10. #40
    FellMonster
    Guest

    Re: Flm

    Quote Originally Posted by dominion View Post
    The UKA 'A' standard for the Worlds is 2-12, the 'B' standard is 2-16. Either way a PB by over 2 minutes is a fabulous improvement.

    As to why UKA insist on an 'A' standard 6 minutes faster than the official IAAF standard (2-18) is anyone's guess! Oh yeah... I've just remembered why... it's so they can waste more money funding sprint relay squads to drop the baton...
    Indeed, a splendid run by Andi..a huge PB................
    The reason they insist on an 'A' standard 6 minutes faster than the official IAAF standard is because (as Andi himself pointed out in a recent thread) that they want any travelling athletes to be in with a reasonable medal chance.....anything else (other than taking a very young talented athlete) would be seen in UKA eyes as a "waste" of resources.......as amusing as your point is Dom, the UKA sprint relay team will always be in with a realistic medal chance IF they can hold onto the baton......hence UKA can justify (in their eyes) taking 7/8 or more athletes (including those in the individual 100 and / or 200m sprints you understand)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •