Hi folks
I started road running a few months ago, but would really like to be out on the fells. I live on the edge of the Lake District, so accessibility is not a problem, I've got years of fell walking experience, and I think I've now just about got enough basic fitness to give it a go (although I invisage lots of walking uphill).
Looking to buy my first pair of fell shoes, and wondering what 'level' of shoe I should be looking at. I realise fit is really important, and I'm going down to Pete Bland's in a couple of weeks to get checked out for some road shoes, so I'll be able to try a selection on. I'm not going to be doing any racing for a little while (but who knows...), and doing mainly just short stuff, mostly in the dry (ha ha!)
My main question is - should I be going for a more gentle 'all-round' shoe like the mudroc or highlander, or a full-on, grippy, minimal-cushioning shoe like the mudclaw or walsh (e.g. pb ultra - I've got v.wide feet and a high instep). Is it OK for a beginner to start with the 'real thing' or an am going to be hobbling about holding my poor tootsies in agony. Or will the extra grip help give me more confidence? (based on my skiing 'technique', I imagine I'm going to find it easy enough to 'go for it' on the descents!)
I have got a pair of terrocs, which I've found useless in the mud when I have gone off-road, but maybe they'll do me for harder, dryer runs if I do go down the mudclaw/walsh route?
Any advice/encouragement would be most appreciated!




Reply With Quote


