Many of us have had rope support for the ascent/descent of Broad Stand. It's graded a Moderate rock climb, there's a potentially fatal drop off so common sense says protect it, if you go that way.
So I think that BG ethics developed over the years make any blanket rule about "no rope assistance" a non-starter, never mind the concerns arising from any suggestion that the BG Club somehow advocated or approved soloing BS.
I have prepared some revised Guidelines for the BG Club website with text about Broad Stand, which both Bob and Baggins have kindly looked at.
What would the feeling be about a BG Club rule that said that anyone who went against any BS guidance from the Club would not have their round recognised for membership?
Difficult to police I know, but new guidelines and that approach might be all that was needed to have the right impact?
Morgan