Im confused as to why younger runners are being able to run in the senior races !??, not mentioning names but i have seen at least two doing this. Surely this is unfair where points come into play ?? - From the Helmhill website "All competitors run in the age group they are in on the 1st of January 2011 and stay in that group for all of the races.
Categories are boys and girls in each group: Under 12, Under 14 & Under 17. Senior men and women. Vet 40, 50 & 60 men"
You've got a valid point there Scott. The two under 17's runners who have run in the senior races are both quality runners in their age group. But does that give them the right to enter the senior ranks?Originally Posted by scott baistow 93
Now then, I remember a post on this thread a couple of weeks ago which mentioned the word "nepotism":wink:
Last edited by wharfeego; 22-02-2011 at 10:06 AM.
Spaniels? I think the name Tommy Trailhound is a bit of a clue.
Presumably it's named after John Ruskin.
last Sunday's Cautley race...winter?
Some cracking photos Wharfee. Are you going to stick them all together we can view them?
It was an absolutely cracking day.
I'm ganna bung some on Flickr. I'll stick a link on 'ere when I've done 'em.
Nice one :-)
cheers Wharfee.
I was just viewing your brilliant "One man and his Weasel" vid again Wharfee
All that squealing attracted my cat and now he won't stop bothering me for a replay
Does anyone have a rough course distance for Austwick this weekend? If it's not too far i might do it instead of a training run. The location GR is for a field outside the village by a beck, is this right?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
