Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 83

Thread: Poles

  1. #61
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    1,288

    Re: light weight poles

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike T View Post
    ...er .... no comment?
    Is this a first? Are you feeling OK, Mike?

  2. #62
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ambleside
    Posts
    6,160

    Re: light weight poles

    Quote Originally Posted by Alexandra View Post
    Is this a first? Are you feeling OK, Mike?
    ......I must be coming down with something .....

  3. #63
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Whitburn by the sea :-)
    Posts
    2,833

    Re: light weight poles

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike T View Post
    ......I must be coming down with something .....
    Polio? :w00t:

  4. #64
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ambleside
    Posts
    6,160

    Re: light weight poles

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Goatess View Post
    Polio? :w00t:
    Excellent!

  5. #65
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Durham
    Posts
    91

    Re: light weight poles

    Whats more important in a pole weight or anti shock?

  6. #66
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    1,288

    Re: light weight poles

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom R View Post
    Whats more important in a pole weight or anti shock?
    In my experience, the lightest Leki poles feel really springy and responsive, I have never felt jarred by them even on the longest days out. However, I wouldn't usually use them on tarmac, and if I did do so I would fit the rubber bungs beforehand. Anti-shock adds, as you say, weight, but also there is more to go wrong. The joints in poles are already the weak place where problems arise, rendering the pole useless. I would never want to add to that vulnerability. A friend was once outdoors taking his pole apart at the joint, when there was a sudden PING and the anti-shock gizmo flew of into the heather, never to be seen again. I don't want that to be able to happen to me. I also suspect I would find the anti-shock irritating.

    Appalling as the price of the best poles is, if you think you might use them regularly it is truly worth paying up for the best. I have the impression that some members of the Forums think of poles as a sort of crutches, and using them as acknowledging oneself as decrepit or disabled. On the contrary, holding my poles I feel as if I have extra bionic limbs, strong, athletic, precise and armed with feline claws.

  7. #67
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    551

    Re: light weight poles

    depends what you arre using them for.
    for me its weight.
    I use them on long climbs, so shock absorbtion is not an isssue.
    On descents I am running.

  8. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Huddersfield
    Posts
    146

    Re: light weight poles

    Avoid the poles at all costs: Exped Quad Poles (four section telescopic).

    I got a pair for the OMM last October and have used them less than 10 times. After only a few used they started to corrode (even though I dried them carefully) and have now locked solid. Exped have refused to accept this is their fault. So I am left with a pair of £50 poles that are only of use to a 3 foot high dwarf! Better off with some cheap and nasty ones that you can replace every 6 months than some expensive ones that break!

  9. #69
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    1,288

    Re: light weight poles

    Quote Originally Posted by #1Spookster View Post
    Avoid the poles at all costs: Exped Quad Poles (four section telescopic).

    I got a pair for the OMM last October and have used them less than 10 times. After only a few used they started to corrode (even though I dried them carefully) and have now locked solid. Exped have refused to accept this is their fault. So I am left with a pair of £50 poles that are only of use to a 3 foot high dwarf! Better off with some cheap and nasty ones that you can replace every 6 months than some expensive ones that break!
    Yes, either buy ultra cheap and chuck when they break down or buy from a reputable stockist like Cotswold and a reliable maker like Leki. My expensive Leki poles, which I have used a lot and not really looked after, eventually (long after the guarantee period) developed a fault in the strap adjustment mechanism. I was able to take the faulty pole in to my local Cotswold, even though I had bought it from another branch, and it was sent back to Leki and fixed at no cost to myself. The downside was that it all took a while, but I would have hated to have to pack and post it off myself - and then perhaps get a dusty answer from the maker/stockist. Cotswold and Leki are not the cheapest by a long way, but no hassle after-care is worth a lot IMO.

  10. #70
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Genoa, Italy
    Posts
    20

    Re: light weight poles

    I use CAMP XENON, they're as light as Raidlight ones, and cost nearly half.

    In long races (50 miles +) with significant climbing, they're a big help.

Similar Threads

  1. Walking poles at Ennerdale!
    By invalidpassword in forum General Fellrunning Issues
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 03-01-2017, 01:34 PM
  2. Found walking poles
    By Mark G in forum Lost and Found
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-01-2010, 08:38 PM
  3. Trekking Poles In Races?
    By Alexandra in forum Races
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 18-07-2009, 09:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •