Page 15 of 41 FirstFirst ... 5131415161725 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 410

Thread: DQ the cheats

  1. #141

    Re: DQ the cheats

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheeze View Post
    WJB, welcome to the fold! Over the years I've enjoyed this forum almost as much as the running. Things can get blunt, overheated, downright rude at times but, like fell running, it is the refreshing freedom to express yourself with like minded individuals that makes the forum so addictive (for a very tiny, sad minority of the fell fraternity!!). In your case, I think the football analogy is very pertinent. If someone joined a game you were playing and then whined that they did not know about handball I suspect you would think they were a bit of a twat and, at the very least, disrepectful for the spirit of the game. So can I suggest that you reflect for a moment about turning up to your first fell race without first checking what was involved? And how you might prepare yourself? Without wanting to sound preachy, and at the risk of repeating myself, it comes down to having proper respect....respect for your own safety, the responsibility of the organiser, the terrain you are committing yourself to and the spirit of wild racing in the hills.
    But, no harm done, you've done the right thing and bought the appropriate kit. Just sling it in your kit bag and take it to EVERY race, no matter how short, flat or hot. Then you will always be one of the sensible majority who just get on and race in the proper spirit and not one of the spoilt complaining brats who make life hell for RO's by always trying to bend sensible rules that have absolutely NO effect on their performance.

    Were you guilty of cheating? Of course not. Choose your own from ignorant/silly/presumptious/thoughtless/etc etc!
    A report will be posted shortly on the main website that the runner who ran Langdale without any kit (and who later used the 'first race' excuse when DSQ by the RO) has been banned from all FRA Registered races for 6 months. Had he been a more experienced runner the sanction would have been a lot longer.

    The FRA Committee is also considering broader issues such as the "vetting" of inexperienced runners by RO and the rigour applied to "kit checks".
    Last edited by Graham Breeze; 01-11-2011 at 10:54 AM.

  2. #142

    Re: DQ the cheats

    Quote Originally Posted by Graham Breeze View Post
    A report will be posted shortly on the main website that the runner who ran Langdale without any kit (and who used the 'first race' excuse) has been banned from all FRA Registered races for 6 months. Had he been a more experienced runner the sanction would have been a lot longer.
    That seems fair enough Graham, but when a similiar ban was given for an offence at the Half Tour of Pendle in 2002 i remember thinking how would it be enforced. If he was irresponsible enough to do Langdale with no kit he could be irresponsible enough to turn up at a race and give a ficticous name

  3. #143
    Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    1,895

    Re: DQ the cheats

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Head View Post
    That seems fair enough Graham, but when a similiar ban was given for an offence at the Half Tour of Pendle in 2002 i remember thinking how would it be enforced. If he was irresponsible enough to do Langdale with no kit he could be irresponsible enough to turn up at a race and give a ficticous name

    Something like this would solve it:



    (Could change it to 'Not Wanted'.)
    Last edited by L.F.F.; 01-11-2011 at 10:52 AM.

  4. #144

    Re: DQ the cheats

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Head View Post
    That seems fair enough Graham, but when a similiar ban was given for an offence at the Half Tour of Pendle in 2002 i remember thinking how would it be enforced. If he was irresponsible enough to do Langdale with no kit he could be irresponsible enough to turn up at a race and give a ficticous name
    Richard,

    Even at a fell race, No man is an island...

    Graham
    Last edited by Graham Breeze; 01-11-2011 at 11:00 AM.

  5. #145
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Isle of Man
    Posts
    1,934

    Re: DQ the cheats

    Vetting of inexperienced runners is normal in certain races and always made total sense to me.

  6. #146
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    NH, USA
    Posts
    6,098

    Re: DQ the cheats

    Quote Originally Posted by stevefoster View Post
    Maybe Iain took some cough medicine that's on the list of banned substances or something similair, don't reckon he's a deliberate doper wjb:wink:
    Didn't see this.. I took a simple stimulant... just gave me a quicker start... we all do...

    Pseudoephedrine... its a decongestant... its on and off the banned list/watched list all the time.. if I'm flying and I have blocked sinus's I'll take some sort of decongestant and had checked it wasn't on when I first started using it, but then it had been put back on the banned list without me keeping up to date and I used it in Slovenia....

    Ignorance is no excuse. Last week I got a $100 fine for parking within 10 ft of a fire hydrant... I had no idea about that law, but I was ignorant of the laws and ignorance is no defence. You participate in a sport, you check the rules. You may make mistakes, get caught, but that's your fault. I didn't appeal the fine, people said I should have, but it was my fault.
    Last edited by IainR; 01-11-2011 at 12:50 PM.

  7. #147
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ambleside
    Posts
    6,160

    Re: DQ the cheats

    "Ignorance is no excuse. Last week I got a $100 fine for parking within 10 ft of a fire hydrant... I had no idea about that law, but I was ignorant of the laws and ignorance is no defence. You participate in a sport, you check the rules. You may make mistakes, get caught, but that's your fault. I didn't appeal the fine, people said I should have, but it was my fault."

    This fire hydrant incident is a good example of an unknown unknown - similarly I suspect that most of those who run with no/inadequate kit do not know that they do not know the relevant regulations - despite having signed a piece of paper that alludes to them. The solution is better kit checks - I have never been fully kit checked - but then I always have a full looking bumbag - or I am wearing the kit needed.

  8. #148
    Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Chinley
    Posts
    1,743

    Re: DQ the cheats

    Isn't this unbelievably simple or am I being naive?

    Runners:Have all the mandatory kit applicable to the grade of race you're doing plus any pre-announced requirements from the RO and, unless you hear otherwise, carry it all.

    RO: do four or five random kit checks on the start line with the genuine threat of instant DQ's.

    Why is it any more complicated than that?

  9. #149
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Preston, Lancashire
    Posts
    7,688

    Re: DQ the cheats

    Has anyone thried archery? Ive done it a few times and find that to get it bang-on target I have to aim down and to the right.

    The race organisers could equip themselves with a long bow and a few arrows and pop off the cheats?

  10. #150
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Isle of Man
    Posts
    1,934

    Re: DQ the cheats

    Quote Originally Posted by Al Fowler View Post
    Has anyone thried archery? Ive done it a few times and find that to get it bang-on target I have to aim down and to the right.

    The race organisers could equip themselves with a long bow and a few arrows and pop off the cheats?
    Or speed up the back markers!??

Similar Threads

  1. Cheats
    By IanDarkpeak in forum General Fellrunning Issues
    Replies: 130
    Last Post: 23-06-2009, 12:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •