Glad you enjoyed it, Rich.
Missing cut-off times is always an emotive issue, and it certainly led to some disgruntled folk.
The cut-off times were not a disqualification, instead they were a sort-of short course - for the 7 people who got to checkpoint 5 after the cut-off time, their race position was based on the time they got to that checkpoint, and it was intended that that was their finish line.
But for next year, on the suggestion of the Springfield Striders, I intend to have an early start option, so anyone who thinks they may not get inside the cut-off time can start, say 45 minutes earlier than the rest of the runners. How does that sound?
It does of course mean that they'll be navigating from the front and laying down the studmarks for others to follow!
And then I didn't get an easy ride on Sunday either, with 14 people in a bunch taking an inadvertent short-cut. That's the thing - once someone at the front of a bunch goes the wrong way the folk behind are just going to follow along. It sounds as though several of our flags may have been removed or flattened (despite being put out only a couple of hours before the race).
But it always impresses me the honesty of fell-folk. We're competitive within ourselves but hardly any of us look for an unfair advantage. All the people who'd taken the shortcut came to me at the end to say they had. I added 2 minutes to their times, which I worked out as about right based on the time they gained.
See you next year!
PS: all results, including checkpoint/summit positions now on the CVFR website.
Well done to Andy Thorpe and Jackie Scarf for holding onto their leading places in the series.