Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 71

Thread: "Cheviot" shoes

  1. #51
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,734

    Re: "Cheviot" shoes

    Quite impressed with these, they do feel cheap. But they are effective, toe box is a little odd but comfy enough otherwise.

    Think I may actually record my mileage and see how they do.

  2. #52
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    3,139

    Re: "Cheviot" shoes

    First run in mine today, and I was impressed too. At least as good as a Mudclaw, and possibly with more potential for longer distances, making it an alternative to the Wave Harrier for long trails when it's on the muddy side. In damp conditions it could perhaps even be a Fellsman shoe.
    Startfitness were great as well: I got free socks and an excellent warm top thrown in. The top didn't arrive with the order, but customer services were easy to reach, apologised and sorted it out. That was in complete contrast to my recent experience with Field and Trek, who were useless and from whom I'll not buy again.

  3. #53
    Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    South Manchester
    Posts
    3,861

    Re: "Cheviot" shoes

    my only reservation was going to be their durability
    but I have now done 170 miles in my first pair of Cheviots and they are bearing up remarkably well
    all of those miles have been either training runs in Lakes/Snowdonia or "proper" fell races
    the surface/cosmetic trim is coming adrift (but who cares?)
    but the uppers are showing very little sign of wearing through
    the "join" between the uppers and the soles looks good as new
    the studs are wearing down a bit, but nowhere near as much as my Inov8 Mudrocs would've done by now
    :thumbup:

  4. #54
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,734

    Re: "Cheviot" shoes

    Using mine for easy training runs and there working a treat, not as good as Mudclaws, but certainly punching well above there weight.

    Comfy and grippy, sold!

  5. #55
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Maiden Paps
    Posts
    1,931

    Re: "Cheviot" shoes

    Happy with mine for training, just done 11 more muddy miles and no probs...the free socks and shorts are ok too.

  6. #56
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Normanton, Wakefield. West Riding of Yorkshire
    Posts
    1,043

    Re: "Cheviot" shoes

    I bought a pair at the stall that was set up at the 'Withins Skyline'.

    I've not tried them properly yet, & had intended saving them for running to work, when it snows, as they're cheaper to ruin than my (birthday pressie) Mud-Claws - the salt dried out & split the rand on my last pair of 330s

    I may try them on one of my local footpath/woodland runs on my days-off this week, to see how they do

  7. #57
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Down Under
    Posts
    8

    Re: "Cheviot" shoes

    Quote Originally Posted by barrierfreeman View Post
    Has anyone used these, and Roclite 295s, and can give a rough comparison? Size/fitting etc.
    I wear UK 9 in Roclite 295's and purchased Cheviots in the same size by mail order. The sizes and fit are very close, if you wear your Roclite's a little large as I do for long distance trails, you might possibly go 1/2 a size smaller on the Cheviots for the fells, but if in doubt go the same size as the Roclite 295 and you'll not be wrong.

  8. #58
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Horwich
    Posts
    174

    Re: "Cheviot" shoes

    I got a pair from my local supplier who happens to live next door but one! I've always liked mudclaws once they had been worn in for a few weeks - initially my first pair caused horrendous back of heel blisters as I wear orthotics. These seem to have less of a problem in that area with the Cheviots. Ran XC in them on Saturday then yesterday a 12 mile run over Great Hill. I didn't feel confident as they slipped on the wet paving slabs between Great Hill and Spittlers where the temperature must have been heading to only a degree or two above freezing (it was about 4pm) - may have been as bad with Mudclaws or anything else (Roclites may have been best combination). I didn't really notice at first but they do seem a slightly bigger fit which I remedied by adding extra insoles that were spare in the cupboard. Mudclaws are fine but at £80 a pair that wear out inside a year, they make a mockery of (fell)running being a cheap sport! If I'm happy with them after a year, £30 will have been a bargain.

  9. #59
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Clitheroe, Lancs
    Posts
    110

    Re: "Cheviot" shoes

    Quote Originally Posted by GordonS View Post
    I got a pair from my local supplier
    Out of interest, who is this supplier - i 'd quite like to try a pair on.

  10. #60
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,734

    Re: "Cheviot" shoes

    I thought that they are only available through Start Fitness!?

Similar Threads

  1. Raleigh "Banana" Team Bike
    By Steampig in forum Sales and Wants
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-02-2012, 08:22 AM
  2. "Barefoot" shoes
    By PaulE in forum Equipment
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 31-10-2009, 10:22 PM
  3. Wanted "fellrunner" Back Copys
    By Alexandra in forum Sales and Wants
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-07-2009, 02:00 PM
  4. Miss Grasvegas '08 "Drag Race"
    By Powdered Toast Man in forum Races
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2008, 09:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •