There's been a push since the referendum to attribute the result to the educationally challenged. This report emphasises that.
Those that perhaps appreciate the EU more and wanted to Remain are perhaps those that have done pretty well out of it which may well lean towards science, technology, higher education. Perhaps those in higher paid jobs where the income potential isn't adversely affected by immigration as supply is still lower than demand.
Those that perhaps feel the EU hasn't worked for them, are those in lower-skilled minimum wage and zero or part--time contract jobs.
The next in line for the finger pointing are the over 60s. Funnily enough this is the generation that took us in back in the 70s.
After the referendum, there was a serious backlash, suggesting that voters should have to reach a minimum level of education before they could vote, or that anyone over a certain age should not be allowed a vote as they wouldn't be around to see the outcome.
There's something a little sinister about that and this report just dresses up the same nasty points in a more sophisticated way.
Perhaps if the "educated" hadn't cooked up a fiscal situation which encouraged employers of low-skilled workers to use part-time contracts, boxing the employees in to a life of tax credit top ups, we may have had a different outcome.
Gordon Brown and Osborne have been the architects of this, arch Remainers, who are the clever ones?