
Originally Posted by
mr brightside
Well, firstly let me be clear that the following is just my own scientific mind speculating on the consequences of new information. Nothing more than the subjective. The brain doesn't see with electrical signals alone, it converts what you see into quantum interference waves, which are the language of the Field. This is where the research papers lose me a bit- it has to do this in order to facilitate memory, which isn't actually in the brain, but in the Zero Point Field. The brain acts as an encoder which commits data to the Field and uses it as a database. This database is what facilitates the acquisition of random information by means of Kinesiologic Muscle Testing, as demonstrated in double blind trials carried out by Dr David Hawkins' team over the course of 15yrs of research. If the brain and the Field both talk in the same language then the exchange of data can be reciprocative, and aspects of the Field can 'hack' the brain. It's my opinion that a ghost is interference waves in the field existing as a result of someone elses consciousness now inhabiting the Field, not their now long-gone body, accessing the mind of a living body. The visualisation of this is the result of the fact that the brain has to convert interference waves recieved in the visual system back into electrical signals and feed them back to the retinas. Apparently it has to do this in order to facilitate spatial awareness and 3D vision, some kind of feedback mechanism.
People have done all sorts of animal experiments on this subject, severing 99% of a cat's optic nerve does not cause it to lose 99% of its vision. Some guy systematically burned out every part of a rat's brain, on successive subjects not the same one, and they always remembered where the food was. He never was able to locate and destroy the part of the brain where memory is; because it isn't in the brain it's in the Field.
I recently read that the Zero Point Field has enough energy in 1m3 to boil all the water on earth; and that the contents of the Library of Congress, if stored in the Field, would occupy a space the size of a sugar cube.
I can imagine that this subject isn't something everyone's going to believe or even like, but it feels coherent and right for me. To deny it in the face of what i have read would be similar in scope to saying, "meteorites don't exist because stones don't come from the sky".