
Originally Posted by
Muddy Retriever
You are obviously an EU idealist but unfortunately your idealism is not matched by reality.
I actually think in its first thirty years the EU was broadly a force for good. It brought together old foes in the shape of Germany and France. Economic cooperation does generally reduce conflict. But as integration has increased so the cracks have appeared. The euro was a huge mistake when no political or bank union existed. The cart was placed before the horse.
The result has been catastrophic for much of Southern Europe with a lost generation of unemployed. In Greece GDP fell by a whopping 25%. You might argue that some of the countries were responsible for their own downfall and I would have some sympathy with that. But the euro strait jacket has meant there was no means to escape from their economic woes. A bankrupt country with its own currency would have it devalued pretty quickly, instantly boosting exports. It would be free to control its own monetary policy - interest rates, QE etc. Finally it could normally expect an IMF bail-out, which while involving some austerity would also involve a debt write-off. Instead the Greeks have just had crippling austerity as the the EU moved to save French and German banks from their losses.
Italy is nearly as bad, having had next to no growth since the inception of the euro. For sure Italians weren't blameless having gone into the project with a very high debt to GDP ratio. But Italy, which has traditionally had a very strong industrial base is seeing this being whittled away as it competes at an exchange rate very favourable for Germany but not for them. All the while being dictated to the EU about their fiscal policy. Italians finally had enough and voted for populist parties who now control the Government.
What will happen to these fragile eurozone economies when the next global downturn comes? It does not seem that far away.
This is hardly the Europe you describe.