Page 18 of 22 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 ... LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 220

Thread: New political party?

  1. #171
    Moderator noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Western Peak District
    Posts
    6,248
    Quote Originally Posted by Oracle View Post
    Bad example: The list of bankrupt towns and states is growing.
    Detroit is a ghost town that can never recover. Direct result of corbyn like spending binge, all the same messages, all the way to bankruptcy. All the professional people that can have gone ( just like greece, portugal, italy). Public services once booming now no longer exist. Inevitable increasing tax rates for the few that remain prevent it ever recovering. Just like (portugal, italy, greece) Italy under a lira could reboot. First it must default.
    The economies of the USA are essentially similar, unlike the Eurozone.
    So it's a good example then. I'm not saying all is well in the US because they have one currency. I'm saying no economists are saying the USA would be better if they had different currencies. Why do you think that is?

  2. #172
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,734
    I don’t think that makes much sense Noel.

    It would only be comparable if the Dollars state(s) infrastructure matches the Euros. Which it doesn’t.

  3. #173
    Moderator noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Western Peak District
    Posts
    6,248
    My point I was making is not that they're similar to Europe. It's that the states themselves are very disparate in their economies, taxation, wealth, etc. Yet they manage under one currency.

    But anyway this is probably a tangent of a tangent. So back to the thread topic. How do people rate the "independent group's" chances in the longer term. Will their numbers swell? Will they all be ousted at the next election? Will they spur their parties to alter their course and take them back in, or have they burned their political bridges?

    Interesting to watch.

  4. #174
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Marple, Manchester
    Posts
    2,934
    Afraid it will probably be a failure.

  5. #175
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,130
    Quote Originally Posted by DrPatrickBarry View Post
    Afraid it will probably be a failure.
    It depends how you define failure? If showing up Corbyn and the inherent nastiness of much of the militant left was the objective, it has already succeeded in spades.

    It has also emboldened the moderate half of the labour party to speak out over Corbyn and his divisive back office who now has no realistic prospect of power. All good. They did not dare until Berger (rightly) said enough is enough. As for electoral chances by themselves no - does it matter?

  6. #176
    Moderator noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Western Peak District
    Posts
    6,248
    I note you acknowledge those who left Labour but not those who left the Conservatives.

    You're right, it does show up the nastiness of the militant left. Does it also show up the nastiness of the militant right?

    I'm still working out your persona, "Oracle". Are you single-issue, or will this develop over time? Let's see.

  7. #177
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,130
    Quote Originally Posted by noel View Post
    I note you acknowledge those who left Labour but not those who left the Conservatives.

    You're right, it does show up the nastiness of the militant left. Does it also show up the nastiness of the militant right?

    I'm still working out your persona, "Oracle". Are you single-issue, or will this develop over time? Let's see.
    The difference is this is normal behaviour for militant left, an entire section of current labour membership, which rears its head in most of the constituency parties ( just as it did in the seventies ). Louise Ellmanns constituency voted that all the attacks on Berger were an invented smear against Corbyn! Jennie Formby was part of militant. Militant right agression or racism are simply not permitted in the conservative party. Thankfully Tommy Robinson is not permitted anywhere now!

    Does grump have a personality? Or maybe grump is me? Or is grump only there when Derby is? Or maybe I am yorkshire thug? These are all deep mysteries of the universe.
    Last edited by Oracle; 28-02-2019 at 04:46 PM.

  8. #178
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,734
    The militant right, I think he’s just been banned from Facebook.

  9. #179
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Over Haddon
    Posts
    3,088
    Banned from Facebook? Lucky him!
    Visibility good except in Hill Fog

  10. #180
    Master Witton Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Blackburn
    Posts
    8,897
    Quote Originally Posted by noel View Post
    I note you acknowledge those who left Labour but not those who left the Conservatives.

    You're right, it does show up the nastiness of the militant left. Does it also show up the nastiness of the militant right?

    I'm still working out your persona, "Oracle". Are you single-issue, or will this develop over time? Let's see.
    The Tories only resigned on one policy matter. I'm not sure they resigned because of the constant abuse from Rees-Mogg.

    In fact it has been Soubry giving out the abuse to her own rather than taking it from her own.
    Richard Taylor
    "William Tell could take an apple off your head. Taylor could take out a processed pea."
    Sid Waddell

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •