I happen to think the law matters more than Facebook opinions or actions of over zealous police, with seemingly too little to do.
They should be focusing on such as Peterborough where ethnic communities are ignoring the ban.
The statutory intstrument section 6 says only that exercise is a permitted reason to leave home.
It does not bar multiple times, limit on length , or driving to the start.
Indeed a cabinet office question on the last , did not rule it out.
It does not restrict location, good job it doesn’t because many living in lakes are carrying on regardless on the high fell.
It is a health bill, NOT a civil order bill and must be viewed in that context.
The goal is social distancing, and that is the yardstick by which police will be expected to justify court action.
So let’s obey the law! Not Facebook woke.
Most of the commenters have no idea that others personal situation so actions, eg can or can’t run from home- are not necessarily possible for others. There is far too much I’m alright jack, from those already living in national parks, moralising about what others less fortunate should or should not do.
Some of the actions, like closing footpaths by farmers, which has no justification in social distancing, and closing parks are ridiculous.
If rules change so must we.