Quote Originally Posted by Dave_Mole View Post
so.
You post stuff on an internet forum. Someone disagrees with it. This is apparently bad.
No, it's "maybe even hatred".
You're one of the most prolific "virus sceptics" on here and have a tendency post material which is questionable, defending it as "scepticism" whilst criticising those who disagree as "narrow minded". Then you try and shut down disagreement by suggesting it's "discourteous" or not polite. Whilst accusing people (and not just me) of being "trolls".

If you want to be controversial, people are going to disagree with you. If you want to be "sceptical" of something which is, quite literally, a matter of life and death, then you might expect people to react strongly. Flouncing off in a huff is not a victory, or validation of your views.
Disagreement isn't bad. I would say it's good. A sensible debate is what we should be having on the issue. But having an opinion that isn't aligned to SAGE and the Government is contrarian, or flat-earther.

Yes there are times when I (and I think others) detect a hatred in you Dave. Slime for example.

To suggest I'm a virus sceptic is incorrect. I'm sceptical of the way the UK has handled the virus, mostly since around May time.
Pre May, whilst I disagreed with certain aspects I was broadly accepting that it was tough for the Government to do anything else other than lockdown.

I may use the world "troll" in an incorrect context. There are people on the forum who disagree with me who do not relentlessly make a bee-line for my posts to constantly counter them.
It's seems to me a bit like a restaurant critic, repeatedly returning to dine in a restaurant that they do not like so they can give a poor review again and again.

You don't like me, you don't agree with me. I think that is clear. But I am entitled to my opinion and I will continue to put my opinions forward.

I just wish you had an opinion, other than you disagree with me, or Muddy, or Oracle.....