Stolly I'm only putting some thoughts out there for people to consider and I'm conscious I don't want to fall out with you or anyone on here.
But I don't accept the "inevitability" and 100% confidence you have in some of the situations we've discussed, although I do accept your opinions have validity.
I haven't argued against any facts. I've looked at the information out there and there are University Academics of international renown looking at the same information and coming to differing conclusions to each other.
Facts are thin on the ground.
You've attributed assertions to me that are not as I have made them.
So Stolly, do you think the country only attained a low infection point? What does it even mean? I'm not sure what level equates to low and what level equates to high.
My position is that I think many more have had it than the case statistics we see. I'm not sure anyone disagrees with that. SAGE, supposedly at a tangent to me suggest cases of 100k a day back in March. I suggest more IF the initial assessment of R=4 without suppression policies holds water.







