Why don't you have the courage of your convictions and call her what you seem to be implying she is by the use of your phraseology (she claims to have), namely a drug cheat.Originally Posted by christopher leigh
Why don't you have the courage of your convictions and call her what you seem to be implying she is by the use of your phraseology (she claims to have), namely a drug cheat.
Thats boll*cks. She probably couldn't run without it! Us asthma sufferers should stick together on this one!
wheeze steeedy on mate
she suffers from asthma and recieves medication for it
whats the problem ????????????
I think that's what wheeze is saying.
so we have to agree
lets just take that one drug sabutomol
do we agree its doping or medication
i say medication but clearly if your not an asthma sufferer its doping
am i right or wrong
we should debate this further
cmon you lot , views on this one not a row
I haven't read this thread through yet, but I am sure it will make interesting reading. My cousins hubby used to be a 400m runner - she met him when he was running in the commonwealth games one year for his country.
Anyway, he has said in the past that one of the reasons he gave it up is that so many people in the sport are usuing drugs, he had no chance against them
I carry salbutamol in my bumbag. It enhances my performance in that sometimes I can't run at all without it. It redresses the balance from non-participant to competitor. Paula Radcliffe a drug cheat? Wash your mouth out.
Ditto!
But be careful to check what's in the mouthwash!
Maybe you two ought to read what I put and also what Christopher Leigh wrote, his terminology implies (to me at least) he does not believe Paula Radcliffe suffers from asthma when he says 'a condition she claims to have' (claims being the key word), all I did was simply challenge him to call her what so obviously believes her to be. I am sorry (for both of you) if you did not understand this.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote