Resignation fromCommittee

[alwaysinjured]

[QUOTE=luxinterior;572351]

We all get it we don't need to hear anymore.

Clearly a number of RO are OK with what is happening as explained by Graham - that is their free choice.

You are not Ok with the changes - that is your free choice we all get that.

Lets move on

I will move on.
Wynn already has.

One last however - and people don't seem to get this.
Not only should scoffer not sign up for it.

FRA MUST NOT LET HIM!!!
Since he clearly does not comply - that is their role in safety controlled by what they permit or not.

It begs other questions - is he even insured, since breaching that rule is clearly a "deliberate act of commission" per UKA summary, matched by "material misrepresentation" of the risk as stated in the policy document. Are FRA as guilty as him for knowingly permitting non compliant courses?

An open door for a hell of a row between lawyers, which I would not want to be the wrong side of. Totally unnecessary to allow wording that even gives such arguments a chance. Solicitors earn a handsome living from hindsight wisdom based on exploiting poorly drafted wording. Why give them that chance?
************************************************** ************************
************************************************** ************************