Resignation fromCommittee

[Henry Porter]

I disagree. It's only through engagement by the committee and Graham on this debate that we can see where Mike and others have merit and where they do not. We don't have all the facts ourselves, so need the committee to refute things they believe to be untrue or unjustified.

At some point we need to reach a state of affairs where:
they agree
they agree to differ

That can only be reached by discussion. I agree that statement and counter-statement is a lot less productive than a chat. It now seems that Mike is the one who is being intransigent by refusing to have a chat about his numerous issues.

There is an assumption that forum contributors are in some unfathomable way representative of FRA members. There are probably less active forum members than committee members and most of them are 'injured' which is probably why they are active forum members.