Results 1 to 10 of 497

Thread: Safety Matters

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Master Witton Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Blackburn
    Posts
    8,897
    Quote Originally Posted by Graham Breeze View Post
    Keith ,

    Your assertion is wrong. The FRA has never claimed this. It would not be true.

    What is correct is that SHR (along with WFRA, NIMRA, BOFRA, etc), were sent copies of various drafts of the FRA Safety Requirements during 2013 through, at the time, Bruce Smith.

    Given that WFRA and SHR are independent organisations of UKA/FRA the matter of "endorsement" would not arise and, as we both know, the FRA and SHR Handbooks have been different for some time .

    Graham
    Really - did the FRA not advise the Coroner that The Safety Requirements for Fell Races and Rules for Competition
    • Will be adopted by the other 6 Home Nation bodies
    • That those 6 bodies had been consulted
    • That those 6 bodies saw the FRA as the leader in the sport.
    • That those 6 bodies welcomed the new document


    So either the Coroner was mislead, as he was advised of this unanimous endorsement following a consultation process.

    or

    We are now being mislead as you say only copies of the drafts were sent out and endorsement was never claimed.
    Last edited by Witton Park; 18-04-2014 at 09:06 AM.
    Richard Taylor
    "William Tell could take an apple off your head. Taylor could take out a processed pea."
    Sid Waddell

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •