...now then, race classifications: surely everyone who started the race should be included? because nigh-on 300 people started that race, so the 276 on the ambleside results is misleading isn't it: timed-outs and DNFs should always be included, because it's the proper indication of the toughness of the race. If 300 started, then you're 100-or-whatever out of 300, not 100th out of 276. (Nitpicking, but right?)
Well done organisers, marshalls, tea-and-pasty girls, etc
how come I never meet anyone off here then?
Originally Posted by ZootHornRollo
...now then, race classifications: surely everyone who started the race should be included? because nigh-on 300 people started that race, so the 276 on the ambleside results is misleading isn't it: timed-outs and DNFs should always be included, because it's the proper indication of the toughness of the race. If 300 started, then you're 100-or-whatever out of 300, not 100th out of 276. (Nitpicking, but right?)
Reply With Quote