Thanks for the link Mossdog. That is the sort of article that I know I will never ever have the ability to write, even though I agree with its content.
Even though the two paradigms of thought are incommensurable, it doesn't make them both true.
I have perhaps the opposite interest in the "science of belief" and it is fascinating that we are only just discovering our true irrationality and why it is such an evolutionary advantage, which of course everything must be referred to.
The "truth" remains the truth, no matter what spin is placed upon it. Science aims to fill the gaps in our knowledge with further science, whereas the religous, (sweeping statement I know) are often happy to fill the gaps with god's work.
In order to retain some poetry equilibrium, I refer the honorable lady to the response I gave some moments ago.
There was a young man from Kendal,
Who studied both Darwin and Mendel.
He thought evolution
A neater solution
Than Creationist texts which are mental.