Quote Originally Posted by Trundler View Post
My assertion was neither wild nor erroneous. I will only modify it by saying the majority of material put out by the committee has had a strong anti-disaffiliation spin (and the ballot paper is just the latest example). The stating of the pro-disaffiliation argument has been left up to others (and notably an EX-member of the committee).

Based on this evidence I don't think the committee should be at all surprised that they face accusations of bias.

I think there may be a weight of opinion within the committee for disaffiliation but the "party line" (thanks for your wisdom, end - so enlightening) has always been 'let's stay in for now'. Perhaps those on the committee who lean towards disaffiliation are just reluctant to actually make the jump. Perhaps the membership won't be.
did you read the bumph that UK:athletics sent out??

which commitee have you been on of late?

and where is Yorkshire thug 'IT' normally has a thing or 20to say on these issues??