Quote Originally Posted by alwaysinjured View Post
FRA still does not get it.

A competent person has to lead the safety process, as a safety officer and be given authority to do it, who cannot therefore be outvoted by a lay majority or executive, as it is in corporate safety.. Not give advice to people who do not understand, then be roundly ignored, and told to sign up to the corporate spin. There is a heap of stuff that needs to be done, on a continuous basis not just documents once in a while.

Anyway, I hope they state who their safety advice is, until they do I will assume it is just a spin.

I am happy to have a discussion with such a person. And that would be the sensible thing, since it was me that found most of the "howlers" in what was done previously, and knows what needs doing from here on in. I only hope he is better than the last one! It would be a change to speak to someone still in FRA who knows what the words mean, and the issues are.

Really what is the point of this thread except to try and stir up more of the same anti FRA nonsense that is going on

And Always you come across as very arrogant when you say "I am happy to have a discussion with such a person. And that would be the sensible thing, since it was me that found most of the "howlers" in what was done previously, and knows what needs doing from here on in. "

Why would they need to speak to you?????