Quote Originally Posted by Witton Park View Post
Your fag-packet calculations are too basic. There are other variables which Dr Lipworth mentioned.

I take your point on the chin regards to Armstrong, but the presumption of innocence is important in my opinion.
Dr Lipworth has admitted he is isn't an anti-doping expert. Additionally his article is very poorly written. He tells us for instance that the reading on it's own is meaningless without context. No it isn't. The reading is the context. It tells us how much drug was in his system. We can't rely on a context, the circumstances given by a professional cyclist because as we've seen they tend to lie a lot.